casino 747 live sign in app Oil-Dri Announces Record Results for the First Quarter of Fiscal Year 2025In the ever-evolving world of technology, Nvidia and Palantir have emerged as powerhouses, fueled by the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence. This year, both companies have seen their stock prices skyrocket, driven by their innovations and strategic moves in the AI arena. Nvidia , famous for its cutting-edge GPUs, has firmly established its dominance in AI-driven data center technology, catapulting its stock price astronomically by 2024. The company’s innovation with its Blackwell platform and extensive investments, such as in its CUDA software, have resulted in enviable profit margins. However, Nvidia’s dependency on external manufacturing partners makes it susceptible to market fluctuations, underscoring the fraught nature of the semiconductor industry. On the other hand, Palantir owes its success to its robust software offerings, particularly with platforms like Gotham, Foundry, Apollo, and its AI Platform (AIP). Initially helping government agencies post-9/11, Palantir has expanded its reach into various domains like cryptocurrency and data protection. The company thrives on large, complex contracts with a few high-value customers, ensuring a niche competitive space but also posing systemic risks if sector dynamics shift unfavorably. Financially, Nvidia has outpaced Palantir with a 94% revenue surge in the third quarter, while Palantir reported a 30% increase. Despite Palantir’s revolutionary growth costing risk with its high valuation, Nvidia offers an attractive investment, combining growth potential with less vulnerability. In conclusion, while both companies’ futures glisten with opportunity in AI, Nvidia appears to offer a more balanced investment with its muscular growth and manageable risks. Nvidia vs. Palantir: The AI Titans and Their Future Prospects As artificial intelligence continues to revolutionize industries worldwide, companies like Nvidia and Palantir have positioned themselves at the forefront of innovation. Let’s delve into what sets these tech giants apart and explore what the future holds for them. Features and Innovations Nvidia’s Technological Edge Nvidia has become synonymous with advanced GPU technology, essential for AI-driven data analysis and visualization. The company’s recent innovation, the Blackwell platform, represents a leap in GPU capabilities with unprecedented computational power and efficiency. Moreover, Nvidia’s CUDA software, pivotal in AI and machine learning applications, continues to expand its functionalities, solidifying Nvidia’s role as a key accelerator in the tech industry. Palantir’s Software Dominance Palantir has made significant strides with its software platforms – Gotham, Foundry, and Apollo. These tools are staple resources for government and private sectors requiring robust data analysis and interpretation. Palantir’s AI Platform (AIP) offers sophisticated data integration across numerous sectors, demonstrating its versatility and adaptability in dynamic environments. Use Cases and Market Trends Nvidia’s Expansion Nvidia’s products have transcended traditional boundaries, finding applications in diverse areas like autonomous vehicles, healthcare diagnostics, and gaming. The GPUs’ ability to process massive datasets quickly and efficiently is crucial for real-time AI applications – a trend that’s likely to continue as more industries embrace AI. Palantir’s Strategic Partnerships Palantir’s platforms are pivotal for large-scale projects requiring intensive data processing – a competitive advantage in sectors like defense, finance, and pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, Palantir’s engagement with cryptocurrency analysis and data protection showcases its commitment to staying ahead of market trends and diversifying its application scope. Security Aspects Nvidia’s Security Challenges As Nvidia pushes boundaries in AI, the complexity of their solutions can expose potential security vulnerabilities. The reliance on external manufacturing introduces risks related to data breaches and intellectual theft, necessitating robust cybersecurity measures to protect their technological investments. Palantir’s Data Protection Given the sensitive nature of the data Palantir handles, security is a top priority. With its roots in government intelligence, Palantir implements stringent security protocols to ensure data integrity and confidentiality, making it a trusted partner for government and corporate clients alike. Predictions and Future Outlook The Path Ahead for Nvidia Nvidia’s trajectory suggests a continued dominance in AI infrastructure markets, especially as they explore innovations in quantum computing and edge AI. The company’s strategic focus on sustaining growth and addressing supply chain vulnerabilities positions them well for future challenges. Palantir’s Forward Movement Palantir’s focus on expanding its commercial sector reach and investing in AI-driven analytics positions it for innovative growth. The company’s commitment to enhancing its platforms indicates their ambition to deepen market penetration and expand service offerings. In conclusion, both Nvidia and Palantir are poised for significant advancements in the AI landscape. Nvidia offers robust growth with its cutting-edge technology and strategic industry focus, while Palantir promises resilience and versatility through its sophisticated data management tools. For investors and tech enthusiasts alike, both companies represent pivotal players in the future of AI advancement. For more information about these companies and their innovative solutions, visit Nvidia and Palantir .

NEW YORK (AP) — No ex-president had a more prolific and diverse publishing career than Jimmy Carter . His more than two dozen books included nonfiction, poetry, fiction, religious meditations and a children’s story. His memoir “An Hour Before Daylight” was a Pulitzer Prize finalist in 2002, while his 2006 best-seller “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid” stirred a fierce debate by likening Israel’s policies in the West Bank to the brutal South African system of racial segregation. And just before his 100th birthday, the Dayton Literary Peace Prize Foundation honored him with a lifetime achievement award for how he wielded “the power of the written word to foster peace, social justice, and global understanding.” In one recent work, “A Full Life,” Carter observed that he “enjoyed writing” and that his books “provided a much-needed source of income.” But some projects were easier than others. “Everything to Gain,” a 1987 collaboration with his wife, Rosalynn, turned into the “worst threat we ever experienced in our marriage,” an intractable standoff for the facilitator of the Camp David accords and winner of the Nobel Peace Prize. According to Carter, Rosalynn was a meticulous author who considered “the resulting sentences as though they have come down from Mount Sinai, carved into stone.” Their memories differed on various events and they fell into “constant arguments.” They were ready to abandon the book and return the advance, until their editor persuaded them to simply divide any disputed passages between them. “In the book, each of these paragraphs is identified by a ‘J’ or an ‘R,’ and our marriage survived,” he wrote. Here is a partial list of books by Carter: “Keeping Faith: Memoirs of a President” “The Blood of Abraham: Insights into the Middle East” (With Rosalynn Carter) “Everything to Gain: Making the Most of the Rest of Your Life” “An Outdoor Journal: Adventures and Reflections” “Turning Point: A Candidate, a State, and a Nation Come of Age” “Always a Reckoning, and Other Poems” (With daughter Amy Carter) “The Little Baby Snoogle-Fleejer” “Living Faith” “The Virtues of Aging” “An Hour Before Daylight: Memories of a Rural Boyhood” “Christmas in Plains: Memories” “The Hornet’s Nest: A Novel of the Revolutionary War” “Our Endangered Values: America’s Moral Crisis” “Faith & Freedom: The Christian Challenge for the World” “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid” “A Remarkable Mother” “Beyond the White House” “We Can Have Peace in the Holy Land: A Plan That Will Work” “White House Diary” “NIV Lessons from Life Bible: Personal Reflections with Jimmy Carter” “A Call to Action: Women, Religion, Violence, and Power” “A Full Life: Reflections at Ninety”Israeli air strikes on Yemen airport ‘were metres from WHO chief’MAGA salivates at prospect of Nancy Mace taking down 'double-talking RINO' Lindsey Graham

4 US Growth Stocks to Grow Your Wealth and Better Prepare You for RetirementTo win elections, every party goes a-hunting for new supporters. No prey is too small or insignificant - Shani devotees, dog parents, left-handed jugglers, they're all fair game. With Delhi assembly polls looming, AAP has taken this strategy to heart. ET Year-end Special Reads What kept India's stock market investors on toes in 2024? India's car race: How far EVs went in 2024 Investing in 2025: Six wealth management trends to watch out for After wooing women voters with cash transfers like every other swayamvar party, it's now flexing its way into the trendy world of health and fitness. Last week, wrestlers and bodybuilders joined the party, with Arvind Kejriwal announcing that more grapplers are likely to sign up. So, when it comes to politics, strength in numbers also means a good number of strong men. The AAP convenor proclaimed that this akhada association will 'not only strengthen the outfit but also align it with health and fitness issues'. Watch out for future rallies featuring squats and push-ups as campaign moves. Is a protein shake subsidy scheme in the works? This is hardly the first time politicians have ventured into the wrestling ring. Mulayam Singh Yadav was first spotted by a Praja Socialist Party leader in 1962 at a wrestling bout and was roped into the rough and tumble of politics. Mufflerman is unlikely to follow the former UP CM's footsteps into the akhada ring. But Kejriwal is gearing up to wrestle his way to another term for AAP. Just don't expect him to trade his sweater for a singlet anytime soon.SAN DIEGO, Dec. 05, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Robbins LLP reminds investors that a class action was filed on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Aehr Test Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: AEHR) securities between January 9, 2024 and March 24, 2024. Aehr provides test solutions for testing, burning-in, and semiconductor devices in wafer level, singulated die, and package part form, and installed systems worldwide. For more information, submit a form , email attorney Aaron Dumas, Jr., or give us a call at (800) 350-6003. The Allegations: Robbins LLP is Investigating Allegations that Aehr Test Systems, Inc. (AEHR) Failed to Disclose Delays in Customer Orders According to the complaint, during the class period, defendants failed to disclose that contrary to prior representations to investors, Aehr was continuing to experience substantial delays in customer orders, which was likely to have a material negative impact on the Company's revenue growth, and therefore, the Company's business and/or financial prospects were overstated. The complaint alleges that when Aehr announced its disappointing preliminary fiscal Q3 2024 financial results on March 5, 2024, the Company's stock fell over 22%, to close at $11.37 per share on March 25, 2024. What Now : You may be eligible to participate in the class action against Aehr Test Systems, Inc. Shareholders who want to serve as lead plaintiff for the class must submit their application to the court by February 3, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. You do not have to participate in the case to be eligible for a recovery. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member. For more information, click here . All representation is on a contingency fee basis. Shareholders pay no fees or expenses. About Robbins LLP : Some law firms issuing releases about this matter do not actually litigate securities class actions; Robbins LLP does. A recognized leader in shareholder rights litigation, the attorneys and staff of Robbins LLP have been dedicated to helping shareholders recover losses, improve corporate governance structures, and hold company executives accountable for their wrongdoing since 2002. Since our inception, we have obtained over $1 billion for shareholders. To be notified if a class action against Aehr Test Systems, Inc. settles or to receive free alerts when corporate executives engage in wrongdoing, sign up for Stock Watch today. Attorney Advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. A photo accompanying this announcement is available at: https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/db7c87a0-7203-449c-a05d-b7e39025624c

Forthright and fearless, the Nobel Prize winner took pot-shots at former prime minister Tony Blair and ex-US president George W Bush among others. His death came after repeated bouts of illness in which images of the increasingly frail former president failed to erase memories of his fierce spirit. Democrat James Earl “Jimmy” Carter Jr swept to power in 1977 with his Trust Me campaign helping to beat Republican president Gerald Ford. Serving as 39th US president from 1977 to 1981, he sought to make government “competent and compassionate” but was ousted by the unstoppable Hollywood appeal of a certain Ronald Reagan. A skilled sportsman, Mr Carter left his home of Plains, Georgia, to join the US Navy, returning later to run his family’s peanut business. A stint in the Georgia senate lit the touchpaper on his political career and he rose to the top of the Democratic movement. But he will also be remembered for a bizarre encounter with a deeply disgruntled opponent. The president was enjoying a relaxing fishing trip near his home town in 1979 when his craft was attacked by a furious swamp rabbit which reportedly swam up to the boat hissing wildly. The press had a field day, with one paper bearing the headline President Attacked By Rabbit. Away from encounters with belligerent bunnies, Mr Carter’s willingness to address politically uncomfortable topics did not diminish with age. He recently said that he would be willing to travel to North Korea for peace talks on behalf of US President Donald Trump. He also famously mounted a ferocious and personal attack on Tony Blair over the Iraq war, weeks before the prime minister left office in June 2007. Mr Carter, who had already denounced George W Bush’s presidency as “the worst in history”, used an interview on BBC radio to condemn Mr Blair for his tight relations with Mr Bush, particularly concerning the Iraq War. Asked how he would characterise Mr Blair’s relationship with Mr Bush, Mr Carter replied: “Abominable. Loyal, blind, apparently subservient. “I think that the almost undeviating support by Great Britain for the ill-advised policies of President Bush in Iraq have been a major tragedy for the world.” Mr Carter was also voluble over the Rhodesia crisis, which was about to end during his presidency. His support for Robert Mugabe at the time generated widespread criticism. He was said to have ignored the warnings of many prominent Zimbabweans, black and white, about what sort of leader Mugabe would be. This was seen by Mr Carter’s critics as “deserving a prominent place among the outrages of the Carter years”. Mr Carter has since said he and his administration had spent more effort and worry on Rhodesia than on the Middle East. He admitted he had supported two revolutionaries in Mugabe and Joshua Nkomo, and with hindsight said later that Mugabe had been “a good leader gone bad”, having at first been “a very enlightened president”. One US commentator wrote: “History will not look kindly on those in the West who insisted on bringing the avowed Marxist Mugabe into the government. “In particular, the Jimmy Carter foreign policy... bears some responsibility for the fate of a small African country with scant connection to American national interests.” In recent years Mr Carter developed a reputation as an international peace negotiator. He won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 for his commitment to finding peaceful solutions to international conflicts, his work with human rights and democracy initiatives, and his promotion of economic and social programmes. Mr Carter was dispatched to North Korea in August 2008 to secure the release of US citizen Aijalon Mahli Gomes, who had been sentenced to eight years of hard labour after being found guilty of illegally entering North Korea. He successfully secured the release of Mr Gomes. In 2010 he returned to the White House to greet President Barack Obama and discuss international affairs amid rising tensions on the Korean peninsula. Proving politics runs in the family, in 2013 his grandson Jason, a state senator, announced his bid to become governor in Georgia, where his famous grandfather governed before becoming president. He eventually lost to incumbent Republican Nathan Deal. Fears that Mr Carter’s health was deteriorating were sparked in 2015 when he cut short an election observation visit in Guyana because he was “not feeling well”. It would have been Mr Carter’s 39th trip to personally observe an international election. Three months later, on August 12, he revealed he had cancer which had been diagnosed after he underwent surgery to remove a small mass in his liver. Mr Obama was among the well-wishers hoping for Mr Carter’s full recovery after it was confirmed the cancer had spread widely. Melanoma had been found in his brain and liver, and Mr Carter underwent immunotherapy and radiation therapy, before announcing in March the following year that he no longer needed any treatment. In 2017, Mr Carter was taken to hospital as a precaution, after he became dehydrated at a home-building project in Canada. He was admitted to hospital on multiple occasions in 2019 having had a series of falls, suffering a brain bleed and a broken pelvis, as well as a stint to be treated for a urinary tract infection. Mr Carter spent much of the coronavirus pandemic largely at his home in Georgia, and did not attend Joe Biden’s presidential inauguration in 2021, but extended his “best wishes”. Former first lady Rosalynn Carter, the closest adviser to Mr Carter during his term as US president, died in November 2023. She had been living with dementia and suffering many months of declining health. “Rosalynn was my equal partner in everything I ever accomplished,” Mr Carter said in a statement following her death. “She gave me wise guidance and encouragement when I needed it. As long as Rosalynn was in the world, I always knew somebody loved and supported me.”FARGO — When Jimmy Carter emerged on the national stage during his 1976 presidential campaign, he captured the curiosity of many in North Dakota and Minnesota with his humble roots as a peanut farmer from Plains, Georgia. Carter, who passed away Sunday at 100, holds the distinction of living longer than any other president after leaving office — a remarkable 44 years. Renowned for extensive humanitarian efforts following his presidency, Carter was often regarded as a more impactful former president than commander-in-chief. Over the last 44 years, we've learned a lot about Carter as a politician, president and social reformer. However, in the late 1970s, people here knew little about him. Still, when reporters asked for their thoughts, they had plenty to say. WDAY-TV News often conducted what reporters called "Man on the Street" interviews. Longtime WDAY-TV anchorman Marv Bossart did a series of interviews in 1976 and 1977 as Jimmy Carter ran for and eventually won the White House. Bossart chatted with regular people about various issues, asking questions such as "What would you ask the new president?" and "What do you think of the president's controversial brother, Billy Carter?" Fortunately, all those years ago, WDAY shared these films with the State Historical Society of North Dakota. Thanks to the hard work of archivist Greta Beck, you can now see them in their entirety. The clips are fascinating for several reasons. First, it's interesting to note how civil the discourse was. The people who disagreed with Carter didn't seem angry or hostile when expressing their opinions. There appeared to be a level of respect and an "agree to disagree" mindset that we don't often see today. For those not interested in 1970s-era politics, it's also enlightening to see what everyone wore and what West Acres looked like back then. In the background, you can often see old restaurants and stores that no longer exist. Here are the clips in chronological order.

In the wake of a successful effort to kill a year-end spending bill and replace is with more limited legislation to keep the government open, Elon Musk declared victory last week on X (formerly Twitter), the social media platform he owns: “Your actions turned a bill that weighed pounds into a bill that weighed ounces!” he crowed. “You are the media now. VOX POPULI VOX DEI.” The stopgap funding measure will largely delay major spending decisions until after Donald Trump’s inauguration, keep the government open through the holidays and at least temporarily delay the most indefensible spending that was crammed into the scale-tipping bill. But those who believe the indefensible spending won’t end up back in the budget are endearingly optimistic. The most interesting political takeaway from the drama is that the Republican Party now has two masters with different goals. Musk’s stated mission was to impose fiscal restraint and greater efficiency on government (though his unstated motives are a matter of speculation) . Trump’s objective was to avoid the hassles of a debate over raising the government borrowing limit early in his term, freeing him to rack up more debt through spending and tax cuts. Based purely on the political result, Musk won and Trump lost. While the bill does spend less than the earlier version, it does not raise the debt ceiling. A case can be made for both goals. I think Musk is indisputably correct about the need to cut spending. And although I don’t want Trump to be able to amass more debt, fights over the borrowing limit are reckless because they put the full faith and credit of the United States in doubt. The challenge for Republican legislators is that they are caught between the agendas of two figures who are very popular on the right, and those agendas — and perhaps others — are in conflict. We’ll have to wait to see how the politics play out. I n the meantime, I also want to address the more philosophical problems with Musk’s position. First of all, literally weighing the value or profligacy of a piece of legislation by the ounce, as Musk proposes, is not exactly logical. The National Industrial Recovery Act — the foundational legislation of the New Deal — comes in at an economical 18 pages, but that hardly gives one a sense of its massive impact on the economy. Then there’s the idea that Musk’s minor budget victory proves his X followers are “the media now.” Huh? The standard conservative complaint about traditional media is that they mislead the public in the service of an ideological or self-serving agenda. But Musk rallied his virtual mob with a host of false claims about the bigger-spending bill. Now he is suggesting that misleading the public in the service of the agenda of the owner of a media platform is a glorious triumph. It’s certainly a triumph for if-you-can’t-beat-them-join-them hypocrisy. Lastly, Musk’s oft-repeated motto “Vox populi, vox dei” — “The voice of the people is the voice of God” — is theological nonsense . Its use by British Whigs to challenge monarchical power in the 18th century was politically defensible, but it doesn’t take a divinity degree to understand that, taken literally, the phrase argues that God is subservient to the passions and vicissitudes of public opinion. It’s very difficult to find anything in the Old or New Testament to back up that idea. If a poll were all it took to change God’s mind, Sodom and Gomorrah would have been fine, Noah wouldn’t have needed a boat and Jesus wouldn’t have had to ask God to “forgive them, for they know not what they do.” One of the earliest mentions of the Latin phrase is found in the writings of Alcuin of York, an adviser to Charlemagne. Alcuin told the first holy Roman emperor to ignore such declarations of public godliness “since the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness.” Musk started using the phrase “Vox populi, vox dei” to validate the verdicts of his own Twitter polls. When users voted to reinstate Trump’s account two years ago, Musk declared that the result he clearly wanted amounted to a divine statement. We can only guess what this says about Musk’s God complex and its compatibility with his role as Trump’s Alcuin. My main objection to Musk’s assertion is that it’s a dangerous lie. The idea that the largest mob has God on its side is even more pernicious than the notion that legislation should be measured in pounds.Stingy Devils open home-and-home with Hurricanes