1. mnl Cutting in line? American Airlines’ new boarding tech might stop you at now over 100 airportsFirstEnergy's FE short percent of float has fallen 6.05% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 10.30 million shares sold short , which is 2.33% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 3.5 days to cover their short positions on average. Why Short Interest Matters Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. Short selling is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises. Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish. See Also: List of the most shorted stocks FirstEnergy Short Interest Graph (3 Months) As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for FirstEnergy has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted. Comparing FirstEnergy's Short Interest Against Its Peers Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis. According to Benzinga Pro , FirstEnergy's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 1.97%, which means the company has more short interest than most of its peers. Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it. This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor. © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

NonePASADENA, Calif. , Dec. 9, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (NYSE: ARE ) today announced that its Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $1.32 per common share for the fourth quarter of 2024. The dividend is payable on January 15, 2025 to stockholders of record on December 31, 2024 . The common stock dividend for the year ending December 31, 2024 of $5.19 per common share represents an increase of 23 cents , or 5 percent, over the year ended December 31, 2023 . The dividend allows the company to share its continued high-quality, strong and increasing net cash provided by operating activities with its common stockholders while retaining a significant portion for reinvestment into its pipeline of new Class A/A+ development and redevelopment projects. For the five-year period ending December 31, 2024 , the company expects to generate for reinvestment an aggregate $2.1 billion of net cash provided by operating activities after dividends. 1 Additionally, its dividend payout ratio (quarterly common stock dividends divided by quarterly funds from operations) remains favorably low at 55 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2024. Growth in the company's net cash provided by operating activities continues to generate opportunities to increase the company's quarterly cash dividend per common share while maintaining a low FFO payout ratio. About Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (NYSE: ARE ), an S&P 500 ® company, is a best-in-class, mission-driven life science REIT making a positive and lasting impact on the world. As the pioneer of the life science real estate niche with our founding in 1994, Alexandria is the preeminent and longest-tenured owner, operator and developer of collaborative Megacampus TM ecosystems in AAA life science innovation cluster locations, including Greater Boston , the San Francisco Bay Area , San Diego , Seattle , Maryland , Research Triangle and New York City . For more information, please visit www.are.com . This press release includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Actual results might differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. CONTACT: Sara Kabakoff , Senior Vice President – Chief Content Officer, (626) 788-5578, [email protected] SOURCE Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.Imagine drinking so much that stocked-up alcohol cannot suffice the demands of everyone. A similar incident was recently reported mid-air! yes, you read it right. Passengers on board an Air India Express flight bound for Bangkok from Surat emptied all booze on their way to their destination. Even before landing in Bangkok, this hilarious incident was reported. Alcohol Stock Finished On Air India Express Surat-Bangkok Flight Taking to the X platform, journalist Kunj Patel (@patelkunj4444) shared videos of his travelling on the plane. On Friday, Air India Express commenced its first trip to Bangkok from Surat. More than the announcement of the airline’s inaugural flight on this route, video of passengers drinking alcohol and munching on Gujarati snacks became the talk of the town everywhere. Many flyers travelling on the fully booked flight shared videos on social media platforms sharing there was no alcohol left on it after a point of time. According to videos and reports making rounds on the Internet, flyers onboard this Air India Express flight finished about 15 litres of premium alcoholic beverages. The stock of booze worth over ₹1.8 lakh included Bacardi, Chivas Regal, and beer. Before the flight could land in Bangkok, the cabin crew announced that no alcohol was left to serve on the aircraft. According to Kunj Patel’s post on the X platform, 300 passengers consumed 15 litres of alcohol on this 4-hour journey from Surat to Bangkok. Social media users are quite surprised to read the much-talked-about news and watch these viral videos. Also read: Air India Express Launches Direct Flights From Odisha To Kochi, Patna And Other Cities; Check Flight Timings And Other Details Passengers Ate Loads Of Gujarati Snacks Too The trip to Bangkok from Surat was accompanied by many lip-smacking snacks along with booze. Many passengers boarded the flight with Gujarati snacks such as khaman and thepla. Some of them even brought different dishes as well. Pizzas were brought on the Air India Express flight too. Booze provided by the airline was relished with these delicious savoury snacks and other delicacies. Also read: Good News, Kolkatans! Air India Express Starts Direct Flights From Kolkata To Andaman Islands Passengers surely made the most out of this flight journey between Surat and Bangkok and had a fun time. Looks like this turned out to be an unforgettable trip for many. Cover Image Courtesy: X/ Kunj Patel (@patelkunj4444), Wikimedia CommonsPeople ensnared by love scams often pugnaciously defend the scammer and isolate themselves even more, says the writer. “Old age is not a battle. Old age is a massacre” was that wry observation made by the protagonist in American writer Philip Roth’s novel Everyman, which chronicles the misdeeds, despair and losses that come with growing old. Among the indignities of ageing must surely include being targeted as an easy mark for a scam – a threat that’s heightened these days by technology making it difficult to tell online if someone is real. Older people are disproportionately targeted for scams because they are perceived to have more money, to be less savvy with technology, and more likely to have cognitive decline and deficits. Already a subscriber? Log in Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month $9.90 $9.90/month No contract ST app access on 1 mobile device Subscribe now All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you. Read 3 articles and stand to win rewards Spin the wheel now

Hyderabad would reposition itself as global leader: Revanth Reddy

Cuomo sells himself as pro-Israel with New York City mayoral race incomingAnalysis: GM and other US automakers would take big hit from Trump tariffs

It might be tempting to assume that Donald Trump's return to the White House augurs stability in US-India relations. After all, there is strong bipartisan support in Washington for deeper ties, particularly as a counterbalance to China's growing economic and geopolitical influence. Not so fast. To be sure, the strategic partnership between the United States and India offers several mutual benefits. Unlike other partners, India is not seeking US financial or military aid. And beyond their personal rapport, there is also a clear ideological alignment between Mr Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) agenda and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Hindu nationalism. Despite this, Mr Trump's second term could pose significant risks to the bilateral relationship, owing to two Indian vulnerabilities. First, although Mr Trump's transactional approach to politics makes him unpredictable, his support for using tariffs to reduce America's trade deficit has been steadfast. His recent pledge to impose a 25% tariff on all products coming into the US from Canada and Mexico, as well as an additional 10% tariff on all Chinese imports, is a prime example. This spells trouble for India, which maintains some of the world's highest tariffs and has a growing trade surplus with the US (nearly $46 billion, or 1.5 trillion baht, in 2022). Mr Trump's trade czar, Robert Lighthizer, has already labelled India the world's "most protectionist" country, suggesting that heightened trade tensions are all but inevitable. India's second vulnerability is Chinese expansionism. Although Mr Trump views China's economy and trade practices as existential threats, his concerns do not extend to its military aggression. The security partnership between India and the US, rooted in a shared interest in countering China's territorial ambitions, cannot be taken for granted under Mr Trump. While Marco Rubio and Mike Waltz -- Trump's picks for Secretary of State and National Security Adviser, respectively -- are staunch China hawks, the president-elect's own instincts lean heavily toward non-interventionism. More isolationist than interventionist, Mr Trump has often rejected the establishment consensus on the need to maintain Pax Americana. Given his aversion to interfering in foreign military conflicts, Mr Trump may be inclined to overlook China's actions in Taiwan, the South China Sea, and even the Himalayas if it means securing meaningful trade concessions. Notably, his approach to Taiwan appears to be driven more by the perception that the island "stole" America's semiconductor industry than by its strategic value as an ally. Elon Musk and other influential billionaires within Mr Trump's inner circle, eager to maintain access to Chinese markets, could further encourage him to turn a blind eye to China's expansionist agenda. How should India manage these risks? One option is to adopt a cautious, wait-and-see strategy, addressing Mr Trump's demands by selectively reducing tariffs, removing trade barriers in key sectors, and increasing military purchases. A more cynical strategy would involve leveraging Mr Trump's personal business interests by steering investments toward his family's hotels and real-estate ventures. A more principled response would be to initiate talks with the US on a bilateral deal or free-trade agreement (FTA). India stands to gain from trade liberalisation. Its garment and footwear industries, for example, are at a significant disadvantage compared to Vietnamese competitors, which benefit from FTAs, and several African countries that enjoy duty-free access under the US African Growth and Opportunity Act. A bilateral FTA could reduce US tariffs on labour-intensive Indian exports, thereby levelling the playing field. Such an agreement would also enable India to capitalise on many companies' "China plus one" strategy, whereby firms diversify their supply chains by establishing manufacturing facilities outside the People's Republic. Mr Trump's proposed tariffs on Chinese imports are likely to accelerate capital flight from China, prompting foreign companies to search for alternative investment destinations. With the right policies in place, India could benefit from this trend, just as Vietnam and Mexico reaped the rewards after Mr Trump's previous administration imposed tariffs on Chinese imports. Moreover, an FTA would give India a rare opportunity to revive its struggling manufacturing sector. Although Mr Trump may prioritise onshoring over "friend-shoring," potentially diminishing India's appeal as an investment destination, an FTA could help ease his reservations. By opening its domestic market to American businesses, India could harness the "China plus one" trend and strengthen economic ties with the US. Admittedly, market liberalisation could encounter political resistance. But while trade reforms often face domestic opposition, India's reforms may prove less contentious, as its imports from the US are dominated by energy-related products and gold -- sectors with few vocal constituencies opposing liberalisation. On the export side, major industries such as gems and jewelry, pharmaceuticals, apparel, and machinery would all benefit from stronger trade ties with the US. Indian apparel exporters, for example, have long decried the preferential access to US markets enjoyed by countries like Vietnam. In the US, on the other hand, the selling point for an FTA with India would be its asymmetric tariff reductions. Mr Trump has often criticised the disparity between America's low tariffs and the higher duties imposed by its trade partners. By securing reduced Indian tariffs, such an agreement could provide a significant boost to Mr Trump's trade agenda. Resolving trade tensions could also pave the way for India to tackle other pressing bilateral priorities, such as securing current levels of H-1B visas (for workers with special skills needed in the US) and facilitating cooperation on technological development and defence production. Conversely, failing to address the trade issue risks reducing Mr Trump's willingness to strengthen ties, especially if he views China as a less significant strategic threat than his predecessors have done. While Mr Trump's tariffs often seem like a solution in search of a problem, they offer India a chance to attract the capital fleeing China and foster bilateral cooperation with the US. Mr Modi's government should act now to convert Mr Trump's obsession into India's opportunity. ©2024 Project Syndicate Arvind Subramanian, former chief economic adviser to the Indian government, is a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and the author of Of 'Counsel: The Challenges of the Modi-Jaitley Economy' (India Viking, 2018).

Cowardice is the only word to describe Justin Trudeau’s failure to truly confront the crisis of antisemitism and violence in our streets. There have been bomb threats against synagogues, bullets fired at Jewish schools, and brazen Nazi salutes. If none of those can drive this Liberal government to rise to the occasion and behave like leaders, it is terrifying to think what will. Social media posts dribbling the same lines about how antisemitic terror is “unacceptable,” “not who we are,” and “has no place in Canada” are the best we can expect at this point. When Trudeau was filmed attending the Taylor Swift concert in Toronto on Friday, he obviously did not plan for it to coincide with the anti-NATO and anti-Israel riots that same night. That is still beside the point. He and his government are petrified by the necessity of growing a backbone and properly calling out these antisemitic radicals as they bend and break the law to terrorize the Jewish community. It was only a few short years ago that the prime minister chose a side during the pandemic and came out swinging against the unvaccinated at rallies and in Parliament. Trudeau staked out the battle lines between those who took the jab and those who did not, and fought an entire election on it. “Do we tolerate these people?” were his words when it came to the unvaccinated. Trudeau went so far as to invoke the Emergencies Act when the Freedom Convoy came to occupy Ottawa. The convoy was rowdy and disruptive, but they did not set fire to synagogues or fired bullets at Jewish schools. The Friday riot in Montreal was just one in a series of coordinated actions designed to rile up fear and intimidation. No matter how you feel about the Freedom Convoy, they never went as far as the anti-Israel mobs have, as they throw up the Nazi salute and parade through Jewish neighbourhoods. Fortunately, not every part of the government has been idle during this time. Suspects from other incidents, such as the man who threatened to kill a counter-demonstrator at an anti-Israel protest in Toronto last year, were taken into custody. A few months ago, the police detained a suspect in Quebec who was allegedly planning to travel to New York City and murder scores of Jewish people on the anniversary of 9/11. With this murderous intent plain for all to see, why are the Liberals so afraid of publicly taking an unambiguous stand against the anti-Israel mob? Nobody has to love Israel to understand why it is wrong to only do the bare minimum to condemn antisemitism at these demonstrations and those who go further with violence. Trudeau’s failure to even try and rally Canadians against it is equal parts bewildering, infuriating, and suspect. Perhaps Trudeau’s own cabinet can provide a clue for their cravenness. Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly is as large a liability as can be found in the entire government. Joly is an utterly inept minister who has proven herself an equally careless politician. Former NDP leader Thomas Mulcair wrote last month that Joly had explicitly alluded to the “ demographics ” of her Montreal riding when it came to navigating Middle Eastern foreign policy. The phrase “demographics is destiny” is beloved among the alt-right, especially in online platforms like Reddit and 4Chan. In real life, in the House of Commons, however, it would seem that the Liberals believe in that phrase more fervently than anyone else. If cabinet ministers like Joly show us anything, it’s that the Liberals value getting re-elected over taking a risk to set a brave example. There is management, and then there is leadership. Trudeau has opted for the former. By not rocking the boat and overtly enraging the anti-Israel forces, Trudeau is content to be a manager. Can he truly be that checked out? A true leader would have stood with his back straight and made it clear at rallies and in Parliament that his government is unambiguously hostile to the radicals who smashed up Montreal over the weekend. That may not move CSIS or the RCMP any faster, but it would show Canadians that their prime minister is a moral leader, not a caretaker. Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre made Trudeau look like a reprobate when he released a long statement condemning the prime minister’s leadership following the riot. Poilievre excoriated the prime minister for opening Canada’s borders to terrorists, dividing Canadians by race, and turning the country into a “playground” for foreign interference. All of it rang true. Poilievre’s words channelled the rage and frustration that Canadians feel after seeing their country transformed into what it is today. One hundred and fifty-seven years on from Confederation, Canada is at risk of permanently becoming a husk of a nation where religious and ethnic minorities are terrorized and all the government can do is try and manage the situation, because, in their eyes, those threatened are the wrong kind of minority in 2024. There must be values that go beyond diversity and leadership that exists beyond social media. Say what you will about Pierre Trudeau, but at least he had guts and was not afraid to confront the terrorists of the Front de libération du Québec when they kidnapped and murdered politicians in the 1970s. So the question should be, to quote the younger Trudeau, do we tolerate these people? It should not take a murder or a kidnapping for this government to bring its full moral and political weight down on the radicals, but their weak-kneed decisions thus far have inspired no confidence that they would even then. This country is broken, no matter what the Liberals and their remaining loyalists spew to try and justify this failed government’s continued life. Canada can still be repaired, not remade, and be the country most of us still love and remember. That hopeful country where people could co-exist and communities thrive without fear is still within Canada’s grasp, but never under the leadership of a coward. National PostJacob Holt scores 23 to help Sacramento State beat Stanislaus State 98-47

Key Metrics Confirms Ripple (XRP) to Hit $4, But FTM & DTX Could Be The ‘Wild Cards’ In January’s Bull Run

None

Entire police department resigns leaving South Carolina — leaving community without law enforcement presence

Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. Declares Cash Dividend of $1.32 per Common Share for 4Q24, an Increase of 2 Cents Over 3Q24, and an Aggregate of $5.19 per Common Share for 2024, an Increase of 23 Cents, or 5 Percent, Over 2023

In the rapidly evolving world of virtual reality, two giants are making headlines: Pico 4 Ultra and Meta Quest 3 . These next-generation VR headsets promise to redefine immersive experiences, leaving tech enthusiasts eager for a deeper dive into their groundbreaking features. The Pico 4 Ultra is setting the bar high with its ultra-light design, which combines comfort with advanced technology. It showcases a stunning resolution, making every detail sharp and vibrant, enhancing gaming realism to a level previously unseen. This headset excels in introducing intuitive hand-tracking capabilities, offering gamers a seamless and natural interaction with the virtual environment. On the other side, the Quest 3 isn’t backing down. Meta’s latest offering not only boasts an impressive resolution but also integrates enhanced AI-driven insights, tailoring the virtual experience to individual user preferences. Quest 3 is tapping into the potential of social VR, betting big on the integrated social platforms that allow friends to join each other’s virtual adventures, creating a pervasive sense of interconnection. Both devices feature substantial improvements in processing power and battery life, ensuring uninterrupted sessions even during the most intensive gameplay. As these two headsets prepare to hit the market, gamers worldwide are closely scrutinizing which will dominate the scene. The future of VR might just hinge on this exciting face-off between the Pico 4 Ultra and Quest 3, as each strives to outdo the other in a race toward ultimate immersion. As technology pushes boundaries, the gaming world eagerly anticipates a new level of realism and interaction. Battle of the Titans: Pico 4 Ultra vs. Meta Quest 3 The virtual reality landscape is continuously transformed by technological innovations, and the latest contenders, Pico 4 Ultra and Meta Quest 3 , are no exception. These groundbreaking VR headsets are poised to usher in a new era of immersive experiences, offering game-changing features that are captivating tech enthusiasts and gamers worldwide. Cutting-Edge Features Pico 4 Ultra stands out with its ultra-lightweight design, making it one of the most comfortable headsets on the market. Its impressive resolution brings unmatched visual realism to the virtual world, allowing gamers to perceive details with unprecedented clarity. This model excels in intuitive hand-tracking capabilities, providing seamless and natural interactions within the virtual environment. In contrast, the Meta Quest 3 leverages advanced AI-driven insights, customizing user experiences based on individual preferences. This headset also places a strong emphasis on social VR, integrating platforms that enhance interconnectedness by allowing friends to join each other’s virtual adventures. These features create a unique sense of community and shared experiences unlike any other VR product. Comparison of Use Cases Both headsets offer substantial improvements in processing power and battery life, catering to extended and intensive use. However, their use cases vary slightly: – Pico 4 Ultra is ideal for users seeking a lightweight device that emphasizes precision and detailed graphics, making it an excellent choice for gamers focused on high-resolution experiences and intricate environments. – Meta Quest 3 appeals to those who value social interaction and community within VR. Its platforms make it suitable for users who enjoy multiplayer and shared experiences, along with highly personalized game settings. Market Analysis and Predictions As the VR market continues to expand, the competition between Pico 4 Ultra and Meta Quest 3 will likely drive further innovations. Analysts predict that the integration of AI and social platforms in VR will set new standards for user engagement and interactivity. With its hand-tracking technology and clarity-focused design, Pico 4 Ultra might dominate among hardcore gamers, while the socially driven Quest 3 could appeal to those seeking a more interconnected experience. As both headsets hit the market, we could witness a shift toward more personalized and social VR experiences. Trends and Innovations The trend towards creating lighter, more comfortable headsets combined with high-resolution displays and advanced AI indicates a future where VR is not just visually immersive but also socially engaging. The success of these innovations may lead to broader applications beyond gaming, such as virtual meetings, training simulations, and more. Conclusion The impending showdown between Pico 4 Ultra and Meta Quest 3 will be closely watched by the tech community. These headsets are not just competing for market dominance; they are setting the stage for the future of virtual reality. As technology continues to break new ground, the real winners are the consumers, who stand to gain access to revolutionary VR experiences. For more information about ongoing innovations in virtual reality and to explore other offerings in the realm of immersive technology, check out Meta and Pico .Key Takeaways Despite most of Gen Z thinking that their jobs could be replaced with AI in the next decade, the vast majority are still using AI to help complete office tasks — and they're open about it. A new survey released on Monday from Google assessed the AI habits of 1,005 full-time U.S.-based knowledge workers aged 22 to 39. Google called the group "young leaders" because they're currently in leadership positions or aspire to hold one at work. The survey found that 93% of Gen Z respondents from 22 to 27 years old are using two or more AI tools like ChatGPT or Google Gemini AI per week. In comparison, 79% of millennials ages 28 to 39 indicate that they're doing the same. Related: Worried About AI Stealing Your Job? A New Report Calls These 10 Careers 'AI-Proof' These AI users are utilizing the technology to take meeting notes, write emails, and overcome language barriers. They aren't secretive about talking to ChatGPT either: More than half of them share AI-fueled insights and experiences with their coworkers. Three in four have even recommended AI tools they have had positive experiences with to their peers. "Rising leaders are not only advocating for AI—they're deploying this technology in meaningful ways, from improving communication with colleagues to freeing up time for strategic work," said Google Workspace VP of Product Yulie Kwon Kim in a press release . Related: Google's CEO Says AI Is Now Responsible for 25% of 'All New Code' Created at the Company AI's writing abilities appeal to Gen Z and millennial workers who use it in the workplace. 70% of the survey respondents said that they have used AI to help draft an email response, while 88% said that AI can help them find the right tone when they write. AI also brings out leadership potential and carries promise. About four in five respondents want to use AI to become better managers and better lead teams. Half say AI carries great potential to automate repetitive tasks so that they can focus on strategic work. These emerging leaders "are not simply using AI as a tool for efficiency, but as a catalyst to help grow their careers," Kim stated. While AI can help grow careers, it also has the potential to replace jobs. Another survey released earlier this month by tech education firm General Assembly showed that 62% of Gen Z believed AI would replace their jobs within the next 10 years while a separate study from Duke University found that 61% of large U.S. firms plan to use AI to automate tasks previously carried out by humans within the next year. Related: Google's AI Is Now Appearing in Gmail and Docs

BIG TEN THIS WEEKFirstEnergy's FE short percent of float has fallen 6.05% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 10.30 million shares sold short , which is 2.33% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 3.5 days to cover their short positions on average. Why Short Interest Matters Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. Short selling is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises. Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish. See Also: List of the most shorted stocks FirstEnergy Short Interest Graph (3 Months) As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for FirstEnergy has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted. Comparing FirstEnergy's Short Interest Against Its Peers Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis. According to Benzinga Pro , FirstEnergy's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 1.97%, which means the company has more short interest than most of its peers. Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it. This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor. © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.OTTAWA — NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says his party will not support a Liberal plan to give Canadians a GST holiday and $250 unless the government expands eligibility for the cheques, saying the rebate leaves out “the most vulnerable.” The Liberals announced a plan last week to cut the federal sales tax on a raft of items like toys and restaurant meals for two months, and to give $250 to more than 18.7 million Canadians in the spring. Speaking after a Canadian Labour Congress event in Ottawa, Singh says he’s open to passing the GST legislation, but the rebate needs to include seniors, students, people who are on disability benefits and those who were not able to work last year. Singh says he initially supported the idea because he thought the rebate cheques would go to anyone who earned under $150,000 last year. But the so-called working Canadians rebate will be sent to those who had an income, leaving out people Singh says need the help. The government intends to include the measures in the fall economic statement, which has not yet been introduced in the House of Commons. The proposed GST holiday would begin in mid-December, lasting for two months. It would remove the GST on prepared foods at grocery stores, some alcoholic drinks, children’s clothes and toys, Christmas trees, restaurant meals, books, video games and physical newspapers. A privilege debate has held up all government business in the House since late September, with the Conservatives pledging to continue a filibuster until the government hands over unredacted documents related to misspending at a green technology fund. The NDP said last week they had agreed to pause the privilege debate in order to pass the legislation to usher in the GST holiday. Singh said Tuesday that unless there are changes to the proposed legislation, he will not support pausing the debate. The Bloc Québécois is also pushing for the rebates to be sent to seniors and retirees.