www sg777 com login philippines login Saquon Barkley becomes ninth running back to rush for 2,000 yards in a seasonIowa had the last laugh, but they found nothing funny about Nebraska’s actions — and made sure they knew it. Following Iowa’s 13-10 win over rival Nebraska on Friday, Hawkeyes linebackers Jay Higgins and Nick Jackson called out Cornhuskers head coach Matt Rhule and the team’s captains for their pregame antics. They claimed Rhule walked through Iowa’s pregame warmups. “So we immediately knew what type of game this was,” Higgins said. Soon after, Nebraska’s captains refused to shake hands with Iowa’s captains during the pregame coin toss, instead either staring straight ahead or down at the ground when the Hawkeyes reached out their arms. Higgins claimed that on Iowa’s first defensive drive, he told Rhule “It probably wasn’t a good idea to not shake our hands,” to which he says Rhule replied, “Who are you?” Nebraska entered halftime up 10-0, though, before falling apart in the second half. “How good did they feel at halftime? Didn’t shake our hands, up 10, they were probably in that locker room going crazy. But it felt great to beat them. Trophy game, everything was on the line.” Iowa then scored 13 unanswered points in the second half, culminating in a game-winning 53-yard field goal from Drew Stevens as time expired. After the game, Higgins made a beeline toward Rhule at midfield in order to shake his hand. When asked if Iowa head coach Kirk Ferentz would ever do anything similar, Higgins took another shot. “No, no, no, never,” Jackson said. “Come to Iowa and be a Hawk, see the difference.” Iowa finished the regular season 8-4 overall and 6-3 in the conference, while Nebraska finished 6-6 overall and 3-6 in the conference. “I can’t imagine being some of those seniors, and then just happening like this again against Iowa, especially the way we played,” Nebraska head coach Matt Rhule said after the game. Iowa’s social media department even got in on the fun, posting a video on X of Nebraska’s refusal to shake hands with the caption “ope” accompanied by a laughing emoji.

Saquon Barkley becomes ninth running back to rush for 2,000 yards in a seasonAlmost every week there is a new toxic culture story in the media, and Australia is no exception. Allegations of toxic management have been reported at WiseTech , Country Road Group, Bureau of Meteorology and Sony Australia to name a few. The culture in some parts of Nine (the owner of this masthead) was alleged to be so toxic that employees dubbed it “Punishment Island ”. According to research , almost half the world’s population dreads going to work. That feeling, in the pit of the stomach, of having to work in an environment of uncertainty, fear, poor communication, micromanagement, bullying or daily toxic behaviours can be difficult to bear. No human being should ever suffer at the hands of a bad boss and in situations where you cannot quit. Credit: Andrew Quilty Yet, what the research doesn’t make clear, is that regardless of this feeling of dread, people will show up anyway because, well, they have to. Groceries need to be bought, mortgages or rent need to be paid, children need to be educated or loved ones cared for. Far too often the advice – if you dread going to work – is simply to quit. But for many this is impossible, as the uncertainties are too great or the risks of loss of income too high. So how do you deal with a toxic boss when quitting isn’t an option? In my experience of having worked with individuals in this position there are eight steps I always advise before thinking about taking on the uncertainty of quitting. They are: 1. Look after yourself first. In toxic work situations, your wellbeing needs to be the top priority. Regular exercise, proper nutrition and adequate rest form the foundation of mental resilience. Your physical health directly influences how well you handle workplace challenges. Many toxic bosses have received payouts in the millions for bringing untold misery to the people that report to them. 2. Excellence as protection. Maintaining impeccable work quality to defend against unfair criticism. Model professional behaviour to ensure there can be no blame laid at your door. 3. Document your experiences. Dedicate brief daily moments to record your workplace experiences and feelings. Simple starters such as “My feelings today...“, “What impacted me...” or “Observable actions included...” are a good place to start. This has a two-fold advantage of creating an “audit trail” of how you (and others) are treated and can also help to process your emotions. 4. Open communication channels. If it feels safe enough to do so, engage your manager in professional, focused discussions about specific concerns and potential remedies. Express how their actions or behaviours make you feel. 5. Involve HR. If direct communication with your manager isn’t viable, bring your concerns to your human resources department. Present objective observations (as documented in point number 3) of what you’ve experienced. 6. Consider internal moves. If these approaches prove unsuccessful, explore transfers or temporary assignments within the company to both escape the toxic environment and broaden your experience. 7. Foster relationships. Develop a reliable network of friends, colleagues or mentors who can offer support and perspective when needed. This safety net is essential for navigating difficult times. 8. Define your boundaries. Establish and maintain clear professional limits regarding your time, duties and workplace relationships. Loading If more drastic action is required, then seek professional advice, or if you have witnessed something unlawful, then alert the authorities immediately. I always advise against sharing your experiences on social media. Not only can this bring unwanted attention to you from the media and others, it can also lead to litigation that could destroy your reputation for future work. That said, people often feel they have no other option than to go public to bring their toxic boss to “justice”. However, be aware that how the company chooses to deal with the allegations may not be to your satisfaction. Many toxic bosses have received payouts in the millions for bringing untold misery to people who report to them. No human being should ever suffer at the hands of a bad boss and in situations where you cannot quit (which will always be the best option). Employing the strategies that I have outlined here will not only ensure you manage your mental and physical health but also provide you with an opportunity to deal with your toxic boss. Colin D. Ellis is a five-time best-selling author and culture consultant. His latest book Detox Your Culture will be published in Australia on December 3. The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning . Save Log in , register or subscribe to save articles for later. License this article Workplace culture Opinion Workplace Workplace safety Most Viewed in Business LoadingORONO, Maine (AP) — Caleb Mead ran for 113 yards and a touchdown and New Hampshire beat Maine 27-9 on Saturday in a season-ending contest for both teams. The Wildcats (8-4, 6-2 Coastal Athletic Association) spotted Maine to a 9-0 lead when Joey Bryson kicked a 39-yard field and Carter Peevy threw an 8-yard touchdown to Montigo Moss, all in the first quarter. But midway through the second, the Wildcats took control and proceeded to score 27-straight points to clinch the win. Denzell Gibson ran it in from the 1 to end a 13-play, 81-yard drive that lasted 6:08 to reduce the deficit to 9-7 with 11 seconds left before halftime. On the first play from scrimmage after the break, Mead ran for a 57-yard touchdown for a 14-9 lead. Nick Mazzie kicked field goals of 21 and 22 yards and Seth Morgan ran it in from the 7 with 2:03 left to end it. Peevy threw for 168 yards for Maine (5-7, 3-5). ___ Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here . AP collegebasketball: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-basketball-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-basketball

None

Citigroup Inc. increased its position in shares of iShares Global Healthcare ETF ( NYSEARCA:IXJ – Free Report ) by 46.1% during the third quarter, according to the company in its most recent 13F filing with the SEC. The firm owned 86,307 shares of the company’s stock after buying an additional 27,221 shares during the quarter. Citigroup Inc.’s holdings in iShares Global Healthcare ETF were worth $8,472,000 at the end of the most recent quarter. Several other institutional investors and hedge funds have also added to or reduced their stakes in the company. Activest Wealth Management bought a new position in shares of iShares Global Healthcare ETF in the third quarter valued at $39,000. Stonebridge Financial Planning Group LLC raised its holdings in shares of iShares Global Healthcare ETF by 2.3% in the 3rd quarter. Stonebridge Financial Planning Group LLC now owns 6,810 shares of the company’s stock worth $668,000 after acquiring an additional 150 shares during the last quarter. Pathstone Holdings LLC lifted its position in iShares Global Healthcare ETF by 10.3% in the 3rd quarter. Pathstone Holdings LLC now owns 18,432 shares of the company’s stock valued at $1,809,000 after acquiring an additional 1,722 shares in the last quarter. OneDigital Investment Advisors LLC boosted its stake in iShares Global Healthcare ETF by 1.0% during the 3rd quarter. OneDigital Investment Advisors LLC now owns 19,674 shares of the company’s stock valued at $1,931,000 after purchasing an additional 191 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Lynx Investment Advisory increased its holdings in iShares Global Healthcare ETF by 7.4% during the 3rd quarter. Lynx Investment Advisory now owns 2,929 shares of the company’s stock worth $288,000 after purchasing an additional 203 shares in the last quarter. iShares Global Healthcare ETF Stock Up 0.4 % Shares of iShares Global Healthcare ETF stock opened at $92.45 on Friday. iShares Global Healthcare ETF has a 52 week low of $82.64 and a 52 week high of $101.31. The business has a 50 day moving average price of $94.63 and a 200-day moving average price of $95.12. The company has a market cap of $4.00 billion, a PE ratio of 24.61 and a beta of 0.56. About iShares Global Healthcare ETF iShares Global Healthcare ETF (the Fund), formerly iShares S&P Global Healthcare Sector Index Fund, is an exchange-traded fund (ETF). The Fund seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the S&P Global 1200 Healthcare Sector Index (the Index). The Index measures the performance of companies that Standards & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (S&P) deems to be a part of the consumer staples sector of the economy. See Also Want to see what other hedge funds are holding IXJ? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for iShares Global Healthcare ETF ( NYSEARCA:IXJ – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for iShares Global Healthcare ETF Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for iShares Global Healthcare ETF and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .

The news of "Deadly Arrival" comes as a pleasant surprise to fans who have been eagerly anticipating a new chapter in the "Final Destination" saga. The last installment, "Final Destination 5," was released in 2011, leaving audiences hungry for more of the franchise's signature blend of suspense, supernatural elements, and creative deaths.

Rising sales of Chinese-made inferior quality power banks is pushing the government to initiate steps to stem such imports that can distort competition while deceiving consumers on safety and performance benchmarks. Actual capacities of such power banks are 50-60% less than claimed. Consequently, a newly-bought power bank which is supposed to charge a mobile phone at least twice sometimes dies after charging just once. Indian sellers are procuring these substandard lithium-ion cells at far lesser than market rates from Chinese suppliers to price out competition and gain market share. Earlier this month, the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) cancelled registrations of two Chinese suppliers--Guangdong Cvasun New Energy Technology Co, and Ganzhou Novel Battery Technology Co - which together accounted for more than half of cell supplies to India. Another supplier, Ganzhou TaoYuan New Energy Co Ltd is currently under the BIS radar, industry executives said. The three companies couldn't be reached for comment. Marketing Digital marketing - Wordpress Website Development By - Shraddha Somani, Digital Marketing Trainer, Consultant, Strategiest and Subject Matter expert View Program Leadership Crafting a Powerful Startup Value Proposition By - Dr. Anu Khanchandani, Startup Coach with more than 25 years of experience View Program Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By - Neil Patel, Co-Founder and Author at Neil Patel Digital Digital Marketing Guru View Program Web Development Mastering Full Stack Development: From Frontend to Backend Excellence By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Artificial Intelligence(AI) Java Programming with ChatGPT: Learn using Generative AI By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Strategy ESG and Business Sustainability Strategy By - Vipul Arora, Partner, ESG & Climate Solutions at Sattva Consulting Author I Speaker I Thought Leader View Program Web Development Advanced C++ Mastery: OOPs and Template Techniques By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Office Productivity Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By - Study At Home, Quality Education Anytime, Anywhere View Program Strategy Succession Planning Masterclass By - Nigel Penny, Global Strategy Advisor: NSP Strategy Facilitation Ltd. View Program Data Science SQL Server Bootcamp 2024: Transform from Beginner to Pro By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Artificial Intelligence(AI) Basics of Generative AI: Unveiling Tomorrow's Innovations By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Office Productivity Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide 2024 By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Data Science MySQL for Beginners: Learn Data Science and Analytics Skills By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Leadership Business Storytelling Masterclass By - Ameen Haque, Founder of Storywallahs View Program Web Development Advanced Java Mastery: Object-Oriented Programming Techniques By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Pam Moore By - Pam Moore, Digital Transformation and Social Media Expert View Program Finance A2Z Of Money By - elearnmarkets, Financial Education by StockEdge View Program Artificial Intelligence(AI) AI and Analytics based Business Strategy By - Tanusree De, Managing Director- Accenture Technology Lead, Trustworthy AI Center of Excellence: ATCI View Program Artificial Intelligence(AI) ChatGPT Mastery from Zero to Hero: The Complete AI Course By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer View Program Finance Financial Literacy i.e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By - CA Rahul Gupta, CA with 10+ years of experience and Accounting Educator View Program The ban on the Chinese companies follows random open-market tests of power banks by authorities which discovered that most reported capacities were far lesser than advertised. For instance, agencies found power banks with 10,000 milliampere-hour (mAh) batteries only had a capacity of 4000-5000 mAh. "Sub-standard lithium cells meant to be used in power banks are coming into the market, simply because that market is still unregulated," an executive from the lithium-ion cell industry told ET. "For mobile phones and other consumer electronics, the supply chain is far more careful in procuring the right products, but when it comes to power banks, consumers do not usually check how they are performing. BIS has standards for safety, but not performance," the person said. The executive said Chinese suppliers have been working around BIS standards by retaining physical dimensions of the cell but packing lesser capacity than the order quantity, bringing down the cost of materials. "They were sending a few golden samples to BIS which would meet all the standards, receiving a trademark, for say, 10,000mAh. But eventually, they would use the same BIS trademark and ship substandard cells with lesser capacities to brands in India," the executive said. "The price difference in this case would be at least 25%," he said. The executive added that India imports 1.5-2 million units of lithium-ion cells every month from China for use in power banks, as local production of this component is still at a nascent stage. While a typical 10,000mAh cell would cost around ₹200-250, the banned suppliers were selling them at ₹150 apiece. Lower import prices reflected in the price of power banks sold by generic brands in India. While a 10,000 mAh power bank from established brands is priced over Rs 10,000, there are many priced at less than Rs 600 for the same advertised capacity, a search on ecommerce platforms revealed. With the government action to address the market distortion, the industry expects power bank prices to rise slightly. "The making cost of a power bank including the cell, battery pack, enclosure and the PCB is far higher than what these companies are selling them at. We can expect these prices to now go up and stabilise at around Rs 1,000," said an executive at a power bank maker. The Cellular and Electronics Association (ICEA) has issued an advisory warning power bank manufacturers to stop procuring low-quality lithium-ion cells that fail to meet safety and performance standards. "Businesses using cells from these banned entities risk automatic non-compliance violation under the BIS Act, 2016, which could lead to regulatory action, financial penalties, and even imprisonment for key personnel," ICEA said, calling for companies to audit their supply chain while transitioning to BIS-compliant alternatives. The findings surfaced after domestic cell manufacturers started raising concerns to the government of being priced out by Chinese firms. "India is rapidly creating capacity for lithium cells. Currently, one factory in South India has a capacity to make 600,000 units per month. There's another large facility coming up in Haryana that would supply mobile phone brands. Yet, so far, they have been sitting dry, unable to compete with Chinese suppliers because of the price difference," said the executive cited above. He added that brands have started procuring locally from October after BIS cancelled registrations of the two Chinese suppliers. Nominations for ET MSME Awards are now open. The last day to apply is November 30, 2024. Click here to submit your entry for any one or more of the 22 categories and stand a chance to win a prestigious award. (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel )

-- Shares Facebook Twitter Reddit Email 2024 was an ominous year for the future of Earth. Climate scientists anticipate that it will be the first year in which the average planetary temperature was 1.5 degrees Celsius higher than pre-industrial levels , a critical threshold established in 2015 during the Paris climate accord . Meanwhile a 2023 study in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found humans brought about as many extinctions over the previous five centuries that if our species had never existed, it would have taken 18,000 years for that same number of genera to have gone extinct on their own. The good news for humanity is that people have the power to stop these mass extinctions and stave off the worst consequences of climate change . The bad news for our species is that we are not doing any of those things; in fact, we are led by science-denying politicians like Donald Trump in the United States, Vladimir Putin in Russia, Viktor Orbán in Hungary and Javier Milei in Argentina. Related Laser-based lidar tech is rewriting history — if climate change doesn't erase it first Julian Cribb, a British-Australian author who specializes in covering the intersections between science and politics, has published nine books on subjects related to ecocide — the practice in which humans actively destroy their environment. His latest is " How to Fix a Broken Planet: Advice for Surviving the 21st Century ," in which he warns that humanity is running out of time to fix the escalating crisis. Among other things, Cribb proposes the creation of a Global Truth Commission to help leaders separate good science and information from bad; technological innovation to wean humanity off of agriculture and create food in more sustainable ways; and strategies that will address all of the threats to humanity’s future holistically, rather than separately. Cribb discussed his thoughts on humanity’s future with Salon. This interview has been lightly edited for clarity and context. In the past, you have advocated for a Global Truth Commission. Can you elaborate on what that means, how it would be implemented, and what you'll say to those who claim this violates free speech principles? A Global Truth Commission basically is a fact-checking agency. The world has 420 fact checking agencies , which are run mostly by media organizations, like Reuters, for example. In Australia, we have one run by the ABC, a fact-checking organization that simply checks the statements of public figures. If they find them to be false or untruthful or misleading, they publish their findings. They don't punish people in any way. They just simply expose the lies for what they are. An Indian farmer checks his wheat crop that was damaged in heavy rain on the outskirts of Amritsar on March 21, 2018. (NARINDER NANU/AFP via Getty Images) And we believe now that, such as the torrent of untruths and deception of lies that are pouring forth from politicians, corporate interests and others, we have to make some corrections. Otherwise, you cannot have a democracy. You cannot even have a society if nobody knows what the truth is, because everything begins to disintegrate. Every decision you take is based on false grounds if you allow untruths to rage unchecked. So a World Truth Commission is simply a fact-checking agency that would check the statements of prominent public figures and publish its findings. How do you deal with the fact that with climate change, pesticide pollution, plastic pollution and all of these ecocidal practices, there is so much misinformation that people can't distinguish between what is real and what is fake? How do you specifically make it easier for scientific facts to be widely distributed? The Council for the Human Future is trying to do just that. We're about to set up a world news website where we will only publish scientifically validated, fact-checked information about these things. People are going to have to learn that if they accept false information, they are likely to incur damage to themselves. That's the penalty of accepting lies. People who believe them end up making bad decisions. "Climate change is not the only threat. There are 10 major catastrophic threats to the human future." You can't thrust this on 8.2 billion people, but you can offer them the truth. You can offer them validated truths. In other words, things that have been checked by experts and, and not just asserted by vested interests in business, in commerce, in politics, and so on. Based on your research into effective political activism, what can individuals who are concerned about climate change do to empower themselves in meaningful ways? The first thing is to understand that climate change is not the only threat. There are 10 major catastrophic threats to the human future. And they're all working together. They're all coming together at the one time. Climate change is only one of them. So it's only 10% of the problem we have to understand. The others include resource failure or insecurity — i.e., lack of water and forests and fish and things like that; lack of food; collapse of ecosystems and mass extinction; nuclear weapons, WMDs and things like that; food security/food instability in the global food supply, which is now a major issue worldwide; pandemic diseases, which are breaking out every two or three years now; overpopulation, which occurs whenever you breach environmental boundaries; new technologies, every new technology starts off benign and then becomes malignant very, very rapidly, such as coal being benign in the 1850s, and it's become malignant. Or AI, or nanotechnology, or biotechnology — these are all in danger of becoming malignant because they're uncontrolled. We need control over new technologies; and basically misinformation is a major threat to human survival because people are not being informed about what the real situation is. A view of dried soil after the rising temperatures attributed to climate change have resulted in a reduction of water levels in wells and reservoirs across Sanaa, Yemen on August 26, 2023. (Mohammed Hamoud/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images) Why do you think, when people talk about ecocide, we only discuss climate change? Why do we not talk about this more broadly? Because climate change has had huge scientific effort put into it, and consequently, its publicity has raised its profile above the other major threats. But ecological collapse and extinction are far more dangerous to the human future in the long run. We can't survive on a planet that cannot support life. We're destroying life left, right and center at the moment with global poisoning and the like. Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes . Basically ecocide is human overpopulation. Overpopulation is scientifically defined as a state where you start destroying your living environment. Whether you are a grasshopper or a bird or a human, if you start destroying the environment in which you live, then you are overpopulated. That's how we measure overpopulation. And the human species is way overpopulated, about four times overpopulated now. It's not just a number, it's not just about what is the ideal population of the planet, it's about how many people can actually survive here in the long run on the resources which are finite and provided by the Earth. So ecocide is just a kind of a lawyer's term for killing off the cradle of life that supports us. Are we doomed to be poisoned by pollution or can we still clean the planet? Every breath you take, you are inhaling toxic chemicals. Whether it's from the rear end of a truck or a bus, or whether it's just coming out of your sofa or all those PFAS chemicals , flame retardants and stuff. Every child born today is born with toxic chemicals in its blood. It takes it in through its mother's milk. It gets a mouthful of pesticide. That’s World Health Organization data, not mine. We are completely surrounded by toxic chemistry. A lot of it is man-made and a lot of it is man-generated. In other words, actions like mining development, agriculture and so on, unleash a whole lot of chemicals which impinge on us every day. We get them through our mouths, through our skin and in our bones, by breathing. Every person on the planet is being poisoned every second of the day. It seems like the answer is yes. Are there solutions to this? We can fix them if we understand the problem. At the moment, we're only understanding bits of the problem. We're obsessed with plastics over here, and we're obsessed with hormone disruptors over there. We're looking at little bits of the problem. We're obsessed with PFAS chemicals. They're tiny. There's 350,000 manmade chemicals, right? And they all break down to make other chemicals and intermix with other chemicals. We need your help to stay independent Subscribe today to support Salon's progressive journalism So it's a very complex issue, but there are things we can do to clean up the planet, yes. It's a major problem. It's five times larger than climate change. It kills 10 times more people than climate change, but there are solutions to it, and I've published them in a couple of books. In some of your books, you made the link between climate change and these other forms of pollution, but also how they are linked to issues like famine and war. The way most people are going to feel climate change is in the failure of the food supply, because clearly famine is spreading around the world at the moment. Food price inflation is going through the roof. It's what destabilized America enough for the Trump regime to get in. Trump is a climate impact, believe it or not. Trump is a climate impact, an impact of climate change, because when people get nervous about food availability, the price of food, they tend to vote for authoritarian conservative or right-wing regimes. And that's what's happening worldwide. It's not just in America. It's happening in Australia, it's happening in Austria, it's happening in Hungary — it's everywhere. The world is swinging to the right because of this uncertainty generated by the climate impact on food. "In all my reading of history, I've never found a woman who started a war." There are many ways that climate impacts food.It creates drought, obviously, and that cuts crop harvest yields. It produces heat waves, which often prevent the flowering of the crops, so that destroys their fertility. Rice, for example, will not grow above 42.2 degrees Celsius. The rice plant dies, so you could lose your rice harvest in a certain area. Things like that and floods will also destroy crops. It’s a big problem. Agriculture was a beautiful technology for 7,000 years back in the Bronze Age. It is not appropriate to feed 10 billion people on a hot, climate-ravaged earth. We need new ways to produce food, and there are new ways to produce food, and they're being experimented all around the world at the moment. Climate change is also fueling immigration. How do you propose we handle this? It's very, very hard to control. I read a report from the Swiss in Zurich predicting 1.2 billion climate refugees by 2050. That's terrifying. The number's about a hundred million at the moment. There's about 350 million humans on the move worldwide now every year. But Zurich is talking about a tripling or a quadruple in the number of human beings on the move that is going to collapse borders. It's going to sweep away governments completely. It's going to utterly destroy the old nation-states as we know them. For example, if a hundred million refugees come out of Africa and flood into Europe, you are going to lose Spain, Italy and Greece just like that. Their people in turn will flee north into the other countries. You get this displacement effect. It is actually a realistic fear. The only way to keep people in their own countries is to secure their food supply. To do that, you need renewable food and you need to recycle your water. Can you elaborate on the technology that would provide this renewable food and clean water? With water, it is simply a matter of recycling. You just use well-established scientific techniques to cleanse the water that you are currently flushing down the toilet or running off the city streets and you remove the bugs from it and put it back into the system with food. Related "Universal suicide": An imprisoned climate activist on why the fight for the planet still matters There are three main ways of producing renewable food: One is regenerative farming, which is being practiced by advanced farmers around the world; the second one is recycling all of the nutrients and all the water that currently flow through our big cities, enabling cities like New York or Shanghai or Paris to feed themselves by simply recycling nutrients and growing their own food on the spot with the nutrients and water that they've already got using hydroponic, aquaponic and other systems; and the third one is deep ocean aquaculture, which is being pursued by scientists at Berkeley University of California at Berkeley. It's a very feasible technology for producing an endless supply of food from the deep oceans, not from the coast. I hasten to add, it's not a form of farming. You use the deep water where you're not impacting any other species around the planet. You're not displacing anything else. You're not cutting down the Amazon in order to feed people. These three systems will create a renewable food supply. My next question is in one of your books, you mentioned that women would be better to lead on climate change than men. What does smashing the patriarchy, so to speak, have to do with climate change? In all my reading of history, I've never found a woman who started a war. I don't mean Helen of Troy-type mythology. Women have led countries successfully in defense of their own country, people like Golda Meir in Israel and Indira Gandhi in India and Margaret Thatcher in the United Kingdom. They've defended their country successfully against aggression, male aggression from elsewhere. But in the last 150 years, all wars that have been started, they've all been started by males, either male-dominated governments or kings, basically.Wars of conquest, which are normally fought over territory, food, land and water are things that blokes like doing. A protester is walking towards a wildfire started by a launched tear gas canister during a march as part of a rally against the construction of a giant water reservoir (mega-bassine) in Migne-Auxances, western France, on July 19, 2024. (Jerome Gilles/NurPhoto via Getty Images) What do you think of the results of the 2024 election in which a candidate who acknowledges science was a woman and lost to a candidate who does not acknowledge science and is a man? That was partly the result of misinformation, which we discussed earlier, but also as I mentioned, climate is already driving up inflation and it's making the food supply less secure. There is drought all through America at the moment. People are feeling very nervous. Now, to give you an example, in the 1930s, Germany had been through a horrendous famine and starvation in World War I, when nearly a million Germans died of hunger. That was what drove Germany into the arms of the National Socialists. Basically, this insecurity regarding food and inflation, a massive inflation under the Weimar Republic, shook people to the core. So basically that's what makes people nervous and they tend to go for big, tough authoritarian male leaders. And I think that's what, from my reading of all the American commentary, it was basically economic insecurity that delivered Trump the win. But of course, he's already appointing a cabinet of the cognitively impaired, people who simply do not understand the problem or else are hostile to objective information. You're going to get some very bad decisions in the next four years, and America's going to be a very unpleasant place to live for ordinary, decent human beings. A lot of the ugly aspects of authoritarian rule are probably going to become manifest. So you have my heartfelt sympathies, but it's going to happen in a lot of other countries, not just America. It's happening in Britain. It's happening in Australia. It's a pretty universal trend at the moment, and it's not going to save us. It’s going to speed our demise. Read more about climate change Climate change activists urge attorney general to prosecute fossil fuel industry “Absolutely devastating”: Climate change is pushing coral reefs to extinction, experts warn New report accuses Citibank of funding fossil fuel projects amounting to environmental racism By Matthew Rozsa Matthew Rozsa is a staff writer at Salon. He received a Master's Degree in History from Rutgers-Newark in 2012 and was awarded a science journalism fellowship from the Metcalf Institute in 2022. MORE FROM Matthew Rozsa Related Topics ------------------------------------------ Authoritarianism Climate Change Environment Famine Julian Cribb Pollution War Related Articles Advertisement:

How Washington outsider Jimmy Carter wooed voters tired of Vietnam and Watergate

In the final three weeks of 2024, as the echoes of 2004 reverberate in my mind, I am filled with a sense of gratitude for the past, a sense of wonder for the present, and a sense of hope for the future. Let us embark on this journey together, as we continue to explore the boundless potential of technology to change our lives for the better.

‘Hoarding collapse was an act of God’: Bhavesh Bhinde

Lyric is making waves in the warehousing industry by addressing key challenges with its innovative smart solutions. These solutions are tailored to improve efficiency and reduce costs, dramatically reshaping warehousing operations for businesses worldwide. With projects in smart logistics and intelligent warehousing exceeding a delivery value of 2 billion yuan, Lyric is at the forefront of revolutionizing enterprise warehousing models. The company's innovative approach includes the use of autonomous mobile robots, enhancing efficiency and adaptability in warehouse settings. Highlighting its prowess in hardware, Lyric offers a comprehensive range of independently developed automated warehousing equipment. This includes stacker cranes and autonomous robots utilizing advanced technology, optimizing space utilization and handling materials efficiently in complex, three-dimensional storage environments. (With inputs from agencies.)Saquon Barkley becomes ninth running back to rush for 2,000 yards in a season

Needham & Company LLC Forecasts Strong Price Appreciation for Palo Alto Networks (NASDAQ:PANW) StockEVANSVILLE, Ind. (AP) — Cameron Haffner scored 13 points as Evansville beat Missouri State 57-40 on Sunday to snap a five-game losing streak. Haffner went 5 of 12 from the field (3 for 7 from 3-point range) for the Purple Aces (4-9, 1-1 Missouri Valley Conference). Joshua Hughes added 11 points, nine rebounds and four steals. Tayshawn Comer scored 11. Dez White finished with 12 points, four assists and six steals for the Bears (7-6, 0-2). Missouri State also got 10 points, 12 rebounds and two steals from Michael Osei-Bonsu. Zaxton King had eight points. Evansville carried a slim three-point lead into halftime, as Haffner led the way with seven points. Evansville took the lead for what would be the final time on Haffner's 3-pointer with 18:44 remaining in the second half. His team would outscore Missouri State by 14 points in the second half. The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar .Cal Baptist makes cross-country trip to battle Darius Johnson, UCFFormer President Jimmy Carter, who died at age 100 on Sunday in Plains, Georgia, had endured several health challenges in recent years. In 2019, he underwent surgery after breaking his hip in a fall. Four years earlier, Carter was diagnosed with metastatic melanoma that had spread to his brain, though just months later, he announced that he no longer needed treatment due to a new type of cancer therapy he'd been receiving. In February of 2023, the Carter Center, the organization founded by the former president to promote human rights worldwide, announced that Carter, with "the full support of his family and his medical team," would begin receiving hospice care at home. "After a series of short hospital stays, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter today decided to spend his remaining time at home with his family and receive hospice care instead of additional medical intervention," the Carter Center said in a statement at the time. Carter was the oldest and longest-lived U.S. President, telling People Magazine in 2015, when he was 95, that he never expected to be alive for as long as he has. Here are some of the recent health challenges that Carter faced before his death on Dec. 29. MORE: Jimmy Carter to receive hospice care following hospitalizations: Carter Center Surgery on his liver Carter underwent elective surgery on Aug. 2, 2015, at Emory University Hospital to remove a small mass in his liver, the Carter Center announced at the time. While the surgery was successful and doctors said he would make a full recovery, the surgery revealed further health challenges for the former president. 2015 cancer diagnosis On Aug. 11, 2015, Carter said that the surgery on his liver revealed that he had cancer and it spread to other parts of his body. "I will be rearranging my schedule as necessary so I can undergo treatment by physicians at Emory Healthcare," he said in a statement through his organization. There is a history of cancer in Carter's family. His mother died of breast cancer. His father, two sisters and brother all died of pancreatic cancer. Doctors discovered that Carter had melanoma, one of the most common cancers affecting men and women in the U.S. and the most dangerous form of skin cancer. Melanoma has a very high risk of metastasizing throughout the bloodstream or lymphatic system and to other body parts. The 39th president said at an Aug. 20, 2015 press conference, that an MRI of his head and neck revealed that the cancer had spread to four different parts of his brain. Carter, who was 90 years old at the time, said that when he discovered that the cancer had spread, he thought he didn't have much time left, which didn't alarm him. "I just thought I had a few weeks left, but I was surprisingly at ease," Carter said. "I've had a wonderful life. I have thousands of friends...so I was surprisingly at ease, much more so than my wife was." At the press conference, Carter said that despite the ease of knowing he lived a full life, he would follow his doctors' recommendation to ensure he "extends" his life as long as he can. He underwent surgery, radiation therapy and cancer treatment called immunotherapy to fight the disease. Carter received treatments between August 2015 through February 2016. In December 2015, responding well to treatment, Carter said MRI scans showed that there were no longer any signs of spots of melanoma on his brain, nor did any new ones develop. The former president announced to his church in March 2016, that doctors stopped his treatment after seeing no signs of tumors. According to experts, the successful treatment was likely primarily due to the drug pembrolizumab, which targets cancer by ramping up the body's immune system. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the treatment in 2011. Dehydration at Habitat for Humanity On July 13, 2017, the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize recipient was taken to the hospital for observation after becoming dehydrated while building homes in the hot sun at a Habitat for Humanity site in Winnipeg, Canada. Carter was back at the work site the next day following his discharge from the hospital, the Carter Center announced. Falls at his Georgia home Carter fell at his Plains, Georgia, home as he was leaving to go turkey hunting, breaking his hip, his organization announced in May 2019. The Grammy Award winner had hip replacement surgery at Phoebe Sumter Medical Center in Americus, Georgia, on May 13, 2019. "President Carter said his main concern is that turkey season ends this week, and he has not reached his limit," the Carter Foundation said. "He hopes the State of Georgia will allow him to rollover the unused limit to next year." A few days later, the Carter Center announced that he would be undergoing physical therapy from the surgery and recovering at home. On Oct. 6, 2019, Carter fell at his home in Georgia. He ended up getting stitches above one of his eyebrows. A few weeks later, on Oct. 22, 2019, the former president fell again at his home. He was admitted to the hospital and treated for a minor pelvic fracture, the Carter Center said. Carter had surgery on Nov. 12, 2019, to relieve pressure on his brain caused by bleeding because of the falls at his home. According to the Carter Center, there weren't any complications from the surgery. At-home hospice care On Saturday, The Carter Center announced that the former president is receiving hospice care at home, where he is expected to spend his final moments with his loved ones, rather than seek further medical treatment. "He has the full support of his family and his medical team," the Carter Center said in a statement. "The Carter family asks for privacy during this time and is grateful for the concern shown by his many admirers." MORE: Jimmy Carter's life in pictures Despite the health challenges in recent years, Carter credits his marriage to his wife, former first lady Rosalynn Carter, for his longevity. "It's hard to live until you're 95 years old," he told People Magazine in 2019, a few weeks after his second fall. "I think the best explanation for that is to marry the best spouse, someone who will take care of you and engage and do things to challenge you and keep you alive and interested in life." ABC News' Meredith Deliso, Julia Jacobo, Dr. Chantel Strachan and Gillian Mohney contributed to this report.