live casino demo play Troy Baker will officially star in the next Naughty Dog game, currently in development with co-creator, Neil Druckmann. The news was revealed as an aside in charting Baker’s career and ambitions. “In a heartbeat I would always work with Troy,” Druckmann reportedly told the website. This appears to be the first major news we’ve seen from Naughty Dog’s next project, which remains largely a mystery. Based on very early details, we know Druckmann is helming this work, and that it will very likely be a single player adventure, but no further details have been shared. Druckmann previously hinted the game had been in development since 2020, suggesting a trailer or reveal could be imminent, but a lot’s changed in the games industry since then. As for Baker’s involvement, it doesn’t feel like a major surprise – Druckmann has worked extensively with the actor over the years, in Naughty Dog’s two biggest franchises, and . It makes sense that whatever’s next would similarly involve him – although what his role will be, and whether he’ll be a main character, has not been confirmed. What’s next for Naughty Dog? Naughty Dog itself has had a strange few years, with all of its output being remasters and ports of and over the last few years. Since the release of in 2020, the studio has stayed relatively quiet about what’s next – although it did briefly hype up a multiplayer spin-off game that was . Per Druckmann, speaking to in mid-2024, the studio has multiple single-player games currently in development, although there are few details about these projects, beyond the reveal that Troy Baker will take part in one. There has been some speculation the next game from Naughty Dog will be high fantasy-oriented, based on new posters spotted in (a remake of the original game), and some pieces of art from one of Naughty Dog’s concept artists – but for a firmer answer about what’s next, it’s best to stay patient.Report: UCF HC Gus Malzahn to become Florida State OC

California could offer state EV subsidy if federal credit is axed

Newly named Prime Minister Francois Bayrou put together the government that includes members of the outgoing conservative-dominated team and some new figures from centrist or left-leaning backgrounds. Coming up with a 2025 budget will be the most urgent order of business. The new government enters office after months of political deadlock and pressure from financial markets to reduce France’s colossal debt. Mr Macron has vowed to remain in office until his term ends in 2027, but has struggled to govern since snap elections in the summer left no single party with a majority in the National Assembly. Since his appointment 10 days ago, Mr Bayrou has held talks with political leaders from various parties in search of the right balance for the new government. Some critics were angry at Mr Bayrou for consulting with Marine Le Pen’s far-right party, and some argue the government looks too much like the old one to win the trust of politicians. Former prime minister Michel Barnier resigned this month following a no-confidence vote prompted by budget disputes in the National Assembly, leaving France without a functioning government. Ms Le Pen played a key role in Mr Barnier’s downfall by joining her National Rally party’s forces with the left to pass the no-confidence motion. Mr Bayrou will need support from moderate legislators on the right and left to keep his government alive. Banker Eric Lombard will be finance minister, a crucial post when France is working to fulfil its promises to European Union partners to reduce its deficit, estimated to reach 6% of its gross domestic product this year. Mr Lombard briefly worked as an adviser to a socialist finance minister in the 1990s. Mr Bayrou has said he supports tax hikes championed by his predecessor, but it is not clear how the new government can find the right calculation for a budget that satisfies a majority of politicians angry over spending cuts. Bruno Retailleau stays on as interior minister, with responsibility for France’s security and migration policy. Sebastien Lecornu, who has been at the forefront of France’s military support for Ukraine, remains defence minister, while foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot, who has travelled extensively in the Middle East in recent weeks, also retains his post. Among the new faces are two former prime ministers. Manuel Valls will be minister for overseas affairs, and Elisabeth Borne takes the education ministry.During his first presidency and in his campaign leading up to the 2024 election, Donald Trump repeatedly pledged to crack down on illegal immigration. As president-elect, Trump posted on Truth Social on Nov. 18 confirming his plans to declare a national emergency and use the U.S. military for mass deportations of undocumented immigrants. Trump commented “TRUE!!!” with a repost of a Truth Social post from Tom Fitton, who runs the conservative group Judicial Watch . Fitton’s post reads, “GOOD NEWS: Reports are incoming @RealDonaldTrump administration prepared to declare a national emergency and will use military assets to reverse the Biden invasion through a mass deportation program.” Several VERIFY readers, including Debbie, Jacq and Matty, asked us whether Trump can use the military to carry out mass deportations. THE QUESTION Can the president use the military to carry out mass deportations? THE SOURCES David Bier , director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute Peter Margulies , law professor at Roger Williams University Elizabeth Goitein , senior director of the Brennan Center for Justice’s Liberty & National Security Program Brennan Center for Justice President Joe Biden’s Executive Order #14097 Department of Homeland Security The Posse Comitatus Act U.S. Section 502(f) National Defense Authorization Act of 2016 Lawfare , a nonprofit organization THE ANSWER Yes, it's legal for the president to use the military to help carry out mass deportations and other immigration enforcement actions. The National Guard, with approval from a state's governor, can detain individuals, but the other branches of the military can offer mostly logistical support. WHAT WE FOUND A president has the executive power to deploy the military to assist with immigration enforcement, but there are legal limits on the role the military can play. The Posse Comitatus Act, a 143-year-old law, prohibits the president from using active-duty, full-time service members, such as soldiers or Marines, as a police force, according to the Brennan Center for Justice . That means federal military branches like the U.S. Army or Air Force can’t perform tasks such as detaining individuals or making arrests on U.S. soil, even under a national emergency declaration. David Bier, director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, explained that active-duty service members, barred from acting like police under Posse Comitatus, would likely focus on non-law enforcement tasks. That could include building infrastructure, like temporary detention facilities, transporting detainees and providing armed backup for domestic law enforcement. The Posse Comitatus Act, however, does not apply to the National Guard, Peter Margulies, a law professor at Roger Williams University, told VERIFY. “The National Guard is a state militia and can be called out by the president with the cooperation of the state governors, and so you could have the National Guard from, let's say, Texas, be used for apprehension. That would not create Posse Comitatus issues,” Margulies said. Trump's post on Truth Social mentioned declaring a national emergency, but the president can request National Guard assistance or federal military assistance with or without declaring a national emergency , according to Chris Mirasola, a contributor for non-profit Lawfare. The Brennan Center for Justice explains that declaring a national emergency grants a president with swift authority during times of crises without waiting for Congressional approval, including diverting federal funds or resources. Both Bier and Margulies told VERIFY Trump's deportation agenda would likely face significant legal challenges and be subject to congressional oversight. And if he declares a national emergency, Congress has the ability to eventually terminate that declaration , but it would require passing a law with a veto-proof supermajority, “which is increasingly difficult in our polarized political environment,” Goitein told VERIFY. Military involvement in immigration enforcement is not unprecedented. In 2019, then-President Trump declared a national emergency to redirect military funds to construct the U.S.-Mexico border wall. More recently, President Joe Biden used a national emergency declaration to deploy the National Guard to the southern border to assist with processing and facility operations tied to drug enforcement. According to Google Trends data , online searches about mass deportation have spiked, with some appearing to link the military's involvement to martial law. Martial law involves the suspension of ordinary law and government functions, with military authorities assuming control. Margulies said even if Trump uses the military in his administration’s deportation efforts, it would not equate to declaring martial law. Margulies explained that martial law hasn’t been used since the Civil War and is “profoundly unlikely” to happen as part of Trump’s proposed initiative because he doesn’t need martial law to execute his deportation plans. Related Articles What we can VERIFY about Trump’s plan to close the U.S. Department of Education Yes, president-elect Donald Trump is legally required to sign an ethics agreement No, the president cannot change Social Security The VERIFY team works to separate fact from fiction so that you can understand what is true and false. Please consider subscribing to our daily newsletter , text alerts and our YouTube channel . You can also follow us on Snapchat , Instagram , Facebook and TikTok . Learn More » Follow Us YouTube Snapchat Instagram Facebook TikTok Want something VERIFIED? Text: 202-410-8808

Today's fortune: Dec. 6, 2024 Published: 06 Dec. 2024, 07:00 Audio report: written by reporters, read by AI Read what today holds in store for you under the 12 signs of the zodiac, each represented by an animal. Our astrologer Cho Ku-moon explores saju (the four pillars of destiny) and geomancy for your prospects on wealth, health and love while offering advice on the direction of your luck and fortune. Check the year of your birth for today’s prediction. Friday, Dec. 6, 2024 (Nov. 6 on the lunar calendar ) Rat Wealth: fair Health: good Love: joyful Lucky direction: south 1936: You may find financial opportunities. 1948: A cheerful expense might brighten your day. 1960: You may become lucky with food. 1972: A warm and heartfelt day lies ahead. 1984: Do your best, and luck will favor you. 1996: Expect both spending and gains. Ox Wealth: fair Health: good Love: happy Lucky direction: west 1937: Life may feel filled with happiness. 1949: Be proud of the life you’ve lived. 1961: Today is the best day, so enjoy it. 1973: It’s your time to shine. 1985: Success is near. 1997: Luck seems to favor you. Tiger Wealth: spending Health: cautious Love: conflicting Lucky direction: north 1938: Something new awaits. 1950: You are not the only one who can do that. 1962: Letting go and simplifying can be freeing. 1974: Release the old to welcome the new. 1986: Conflicts within relationships may show up. 1998: A meeting or event may not go as planned. Rabbit Wealth: average Health: average Love: generous Lucky direction: east 1939: Care for yourself before tending to others. 1951: Eat more fruits and vegetables. 1963: Water the seeds of growth around you. 1975: Gentleness often overcomes harshness. 1987: Steady growth requires patience. 1999: Maintain a positive mindset for success. Dragon Wealth: fair Health: good Love: joyful Lucky direction: south 1940: A joyful heart may fill your day. 1952: Good news may come your way. 1964: Look forward to a pleasant meeting. 1976: The higher you aim, the stronger the winds may blow. 1988: Social gatherings or outings may bring happiness. 2000: Spend quality time with good friends. Snake Wealth: excellent Health: strong Love: united Lucky direction: south 1941: Everything has its rightful place. 1953: You may find value in everything. 1965: More is better. 1977: Collaboration leads to growth and success. 1989: Stick together as a team for great outcomes. 2001: Expect an expansion in your social network. Horse Wealth: average Health: average Love: jealous Lucky direction: north 1942: Carry yourself with grace and dignity. 1954: Every action has a reason. 1966: Avoid confusing discipline with criticism. 1978: Stay neutral in disputes to maintain balance. 1990: Be neutral and listen to both sides. 2002: Focus on appreciating what you have. Sheep Wealth: fair Health: good Love: joyful Lucky direction: west 1943: Familiar routines bring comfort and ease. 1955: You may acquire something new and useful. 1967: Clear communication enhances teamwork. 1979: Hard work always pays off. 1991: Avoid delaying important tasks. 2003: White is a lucky color for you. Monkey Wealth: spending Health: cautious Love: fleeting Lucky direction: west 1944: Silence sometimes is the best choice. 1956: Expectations may not align with reality. 1968: Every outcome has a reason. 1980: Write down your plans to avoid miscommunication. 1992: Sweet moments may come with hidden risks. 2004: Be realistic about what you can achieve. Rooster Wealth: spending Health: cautious Love: passionate Lucky direction: northeast 1945: Plans may not match reality. 1957: Consider your age and health when making decisions. 1969: Confidence is good, but avoid overstepping. 1981: Stay behind the scenes rather than taking the lead. 1993: Avoid showing off. 2005: Confidence is key, but balance it with humility. Dog Wealth: fair Health: good Love: joyful Lucky direction: east 1946: Ordinary moments may bring great joy. 1958: Anticipate a cheerful and refreshing day. 1970: Share stories about yourself. 1982: Avoid excessive drinking and unsafe decisions. 1994: A group meeting or team activity may strengthen bonds. 2006: Knock, and opportunities will open. Pig Wealth: fair Health: good Love: social Lucky direction: south 1935: Live joyfully and optimistically. 1947: Appreciate how life has improved over time. 1959: Invitations to gatherings may arise. 1971: Seek relationships built on mutual growth. 1983: Enjoy meaningful and beneficial interactions. 1995: Expect friendly meetings or a romantic date. 2007: Anticipate pleasant encounters or quality time.The original line-up of Sugababes - Mutya Buena, Siobhan Donaghy and Keisha Buchanan - delivered a medley of their chart-topping hits on tonight's Strictly Come Dancing results show. Greeted with enthusiastic applause as they graced the BBC ballroom dancefloor, their vocal performance, however, seemed to leave several fans "underwhelmed". Iconic for their noughties pop anthems like Too Lost In You, Freak Like Me and Push The Button, the trio donned coordinated black ensembles for their Strictly spectacle preceding the results announcement. Nonetheless, their live rendition provoked a spectrum of reactions on social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. One particularly unsparing fan wrote: "Sugababes couldn't be more out of tune if I sang for them #Strictly." Another viewer blunt steered clear of future concerts: "Well, I won't be booking tickets for Sugababes any time soon #Strictly #StrictlyComeDancing." A third spectator labelled the appearance as "Sorry, but the Sugababes were totally underwhelming," reports OK! . Meanwhile, another lamented: "I like the Sugababes but this performance is bad #StrictlyComeDancing." On the flip side, someone else expressed admiration: "Loved the medley from the Sugababes, some fantastic songs...#strictly." With similar enthusiasm, another declared: "The looks, the vocals, the talent... the original SUGABABES are everything and more... #StrictlyComeDancing." Amidst their performance, the audience and viewers also enjoyed a dance segment featuring professional dancer Neil Jones and his partner Nancy Xu on the ballroom floor. After a thrilling performance, viewers were on the edge of their seats to find out which celebrity would advance in the dance contest and who would be sent home. Ultimately, it was EastEnders actor Jamie Borthwick who missed the cut for the quarter-final, becoming the ninth star to exit the stage. The 30 year old soap star and his dance partner Michelle Tsiakkas found themselves in the nail-biting dance-off against 38 year old Olympian Montell Douglas and her partner Johannes Radebe. Following a tense second performance from both duos, the panel of judges reached a unanimous decision to save Montell and Johannes, resulting in Jamie and Michelle's departure. Jamie lauded Strictly Come Dancing as "magic" and expressed his deep appreciation for the entire team behind the scenes. He said: "Not just everyone who you see in front of the camera, these four here (the judges), but everyone who works on this show, I have such a good bond and relationship with and that's what made me want to do this show, it's the people, not what I'm doing. I've had the best time." "We have laughed like you wouldn't believe. I have nothing but the utmost respect for everyone on the show, so thank you," he further added. Strictly Come Dancing returns next weekend on BBC One.

Progressive Corp. stock underperforms Thursday when compared to competitors despite daily gains

Boeing advances safety and quality plan, FAA notes