fortune gems 3
fortune gems 3
Kuwait Denies Citizenship Suspension RumorsMumbai, Dec 8, 2024 The combined market valuation of six of the top-10 most valued firms surged Rs 2.03 lakh crore last week as the Indian stock market ended with gains. In the trading session from December 2 to December 6, Nifty closed at 24,677 with a gain of 2.27 per cent or 546 points and Sensex closed at 81,709 with a gain of 2.39 per cent or 1,906 points. This was the third consecutive week when the stock market closed in the green. Among the top 10, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, Infosys, Reliance Industries, and State Bank of India (SBI) were gainers, while Bharti Airtel, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), ITC, and Hindustan Unilever were laggards. The market capitalisation of TCS surged by Rs 62,574 crore to Rs 16,08,782 crore. The market valuation of HDFC Bank jumped Rs 45,338 crore to Rs 14,19,270 crore. Infosys added Rs 26,885 crore taking its market cap to Rs 7,98,560 crore and the market capitalisation of Reliance Industries surged by Rs 26,185 crore to Rs 17,75,176 crore. The market capitalisation of SBI soared by Rs 22,311 crore to Rs 7,71,087 crore. ICICI Bank added Rs 19,821 crore to its market capitalisation to Rs 9,37,545 crore. On the other hand, the market capitalisation of Bharti Airtel declined by Rs 16,720 crore to Rs 9,10,005 crore. The market valuation of ITC went lower by Rs 7,256 crore to Rs 5,89,572 crore and the market capitalisation of Hindustan Unilever declined by Rs 2,843.01 crore to Rs 5,83,673.71 crore. LIC’s market cap declined by Rs 1,265 crore to Rs 6,21,937.02 crore. On Friday, the stock market ended with a marginal loss. Sensex and Nifty declined by 56 points and 30 points, respectively.(Agency)
Tharimmune Announces $2.02 Million Private Placement to Advance Development Programs
The U.S. believes journalist Austin Tice is alive after disappearing in Syria in 2012, Biden saysCHARLOTTE, N.C. — Front Row Motorsports, one of two teams suing NASCAR in federal court, accused the stock car series Thursday of rejecting the planned purchase of a valuable charter unless the lawsuit was dropped. Front Row made the claim in a court filing and said it involved its proposed purchase of the charter from Stewart-Haas Racing. Front Row said the series would only approve it if Front Row and 23XI Racing dropped their court case. "Specifically, NASCAR informed us that it would not approve the (charter) transfer unless we agreed to drop our current antitrust lawsuit against them," Jerry Freeze, general manager of Front Row, said in an affidavit filed in the U.S. District Court of Western North Carolina. The two teams in September refused to sign NASCAR's "take-it-or-leave-it" final offer on a new revenue sharing agreement. All other 13 teams signed the deal. Front Row and 23XI balked and are now in court. 23XI co-owner Michael Jordan has said he took the fight to court on behalf of all teams competing in the top motorsports series in the United States. NASCAR has argued that the two teams simply do not like the terms of the final charter agreement and asked for the lawsuit be dismissed. Earlier this week, the suit was transferred to a different judge than the one who heard the first round of arguments and ruled against the two teams in their request for a temporary injunction to be recognized in 2025 as chartered teams as the case proceeds. The latest filing is heavily redacted as it lays out alleged retaliatory actions by NASCAR the teams say have caused irreparable harm. Both Front Row and 23XI want to expand from two full-time cars to three, and have agreements with SHR to purchase one charter each as SHR goes from four cars to one for 2025. The teams can still compete next season but would have to do so as "open" teams that don't have the same protections or financial gains that come from holding a charter. Freeze claimed in the affidavit that Front Row signed a purchase agreement with SHR in April and NASCAR President Steve Phelps told Freeze in September the deal had been approved. But when Front Row submitted the paperwork last month, NASCAR began asking for additional information. A Dec. 4 request from NASCAR was "primarily related to our ongoing lawsuit with NASCAR," Freeze said. "NASCAR informed us on December 5, 2024, that it objected to the transfer and would not approve it, in contrast to the previous oral approval for the transfer confirmed by Phelps before we filed the lawsuit," Freeze said. "NASCAR made it clear that the reason it was now changing course and objecting to the transfer is because NASCAR is insisting that we drop the lawsuit and antitrust claims against it as a condition of being approved." A second affidavit from Steve Lauletta, the president of 23XI Racing, claims NASCAR accused 23XI and Front Row of manufacturing "new circumstances" in a renewed motion for an injunction and of a "coordinated effort behind the scenes." "This is completely false," Lauletta said. Front Row is owned by businessman Bob Jenkins, while 23XI is owned by retired NBA Hall of Famer Jordan, three-time Daytona 500 winner Denny Hamlin and longtime Jordan adviser Curtis Polk. NASCAR had been operating with 36 chartered teams and four open spots since the charter agreement began in 2016. NASCAR now says it will move forward in 2025 with 32 chartered teams and eight open spots, with offers on charters for Front Row and 23XI rescinded and the SHR charters in limbo. The teams contend they must be chartered under some of their contractual agreements with current sponsors and drivers, and competing next year as open teams will cause significant losses. "23XI exists to compete at the highest level of stock car racing, striving to become the best team it can be. But that ambition can only be pursued within NASCAR, which has monopolized the market as the sole top-tier circuit for stock car racing," Lauletta said. "Our efforts to expand – purchasing more cars and increasing our presence on the track – are integral to achieving this goal. "It is not hypocritical to operate within the only system available while striving for excellence and contending for championships," he continued. "It is a necessity because NASCAR's monopoly leaves 23XI no alternative circuit, no different terms, and no other viable avenue to compete at this level." Get local news delivered to your inbox!None
Stop your dancing, lip-syncing, how-tos, restorations, commiserations, and online shops; TikTok just took another big step closer to the sharp blade of a US ban's guillotine. The massively popular app could disappear from US phones as early as next month, and while it's an outcome few want, it's the one we're most likely to get. On Friday, a US federal court dismissed TikTok's counterclaim that the US government-ordered ban was unconstitutional in that it infringed on the platform's First Amendment free speech rights. The US Court of Appeals wasn't buying that argument and denied TikTok's petition. TikTok's owner, ByteDance, is fully expected to appeal at its last stop: the US Supreme Court. No one, including me, expects them to win. The last best hope for TikTok is that exiting President Joe Biden decides to grant a last-minute extension. It's an option actually outlined in the ban and also unlikely, considering Biden fully backs this action. Now, I know most of you know what TikTok is, and if the numbers are right and roughly more than half the country is using it, you understand how the social media platform works and why you're probably addicted to it. What you might not know is the source of the US government's near universal discomfort with TikTok: company owner ByteDance, a Chinese operation. All Chinese companies operate under the ever-watchful eye of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and, if asked, have to let them closely examine everything they do; this includes algorithms, programming, and data. Right, you get where this is going. An existential threat When US lawmakers raised these concerns and started questioning TikTok directly, including CEO Shou Chew, the company responded with a detailed plan , Project Texas, to create a separate US arm that included all US-based executives and employees and the relocation of any US data that had been China to Oracle servers in California. TikTok in the US operated for all intents and purposes as a separate company from ByteDance's Chinese operations (the TikTok app doesn't even have the same name in China). This was never enough for lawmakers or President Joe Biden, who signed the law that included the ban. These efforts, however, do not have widespread support outside of Washington, D.C. TikTok users are almost apoplectic over the possible ban and have posted news reports and sometimes pleas to keep it alive in the US. In the past, TikTok enlisted major platform influencers to post on its behalf. None of it matters. The issue here is the existential threat posed by China and its potential access to data regarding millions of Americans. Yes, the data is shielded from them, but there is not much clarity on whether Chinese officials can see or influence the algorithm that decides what you see next in your TikTok feed. For TikTok fans, though, none of that matters. I recall seeing a TikTok where one young user told China to have her data. She did not care and was only interested in keeping TikTok. That's a widely shared attitude among users. They're unsure what valuable secrets China gets from seeing their TikTok data. If the US Govt' says it's their personal details like name, home address, birth date, email, and phone number, the reality is that data is already out there and likely on the dark web. We've already been through the biggest data breaches , and often not at the hands of foreign adversaries. At the same time, TikTokers understand that perhaps government officials shouldn't be on the platform because they're dealing with sensitive information relating to things like our infrastructure, water supply, and the grid. Nothing better to do? It's a bit galling that the US Government can somehow figure out how to ban an almost universally loved platform but cannot seem to agree on how to address any of our other larger problems. There's always a chance that ByteDance will cave and sell because there is no other option. Still, I have trouble seeing China give up a crown jewel like TikTok to its greatest global rival (I contend it will be China and not ByrteDance, who decides if a sale happens). The x factor here may be a change at the top. Incoming President Trump, who initially used an executive order in 2020 to address "the threat posed by one mobile app in particular, TikTok," joined Tiktok during the campaign but has offered little clarity on his ban stance. At one point, he claimed that banning Tiktok would strengthen Meta , an American company that Trump doesn't particularly like. Trump's decision will hinge not just on his personal feelings but also on those around him. As one commentator noted, sitting right next to Trump will be Elon Musk, a key advisor and owner of X (formerly Twitter). TikTok is doomed, isn't it? I gave up my TikTok addiction for a month, and my life is so much ... My TikTok For You page is the best art teacher I've ever had ... Should I delete TikTok? Well, yes, if you care about your privacy ... TikTok could be banned – What a US ban would mean and how ... TikTok owner is quietly doing an 'Apple' — ByteDance invests in ... The only thing you want less than a TikTok ban is China spying on you and manipulating everything you seeBy Nicholas Tan Many are hoping that the looming TikTok ban could be stopped by Donald Trump or Joe Biden. On Friday, December 6, a U.S. federal appeals court upheld the TikTok ban law introduced by The Department of Justice and signed by Biden in April. This means that ByteDance, the Chinese owner of the popular social media app, will need to divest its stake in the platform by the deadline of January 19, 2025 or be banned. Here’s whether Trump or Biden can do anything about the TikTok ban before (or after) that happens. While it will be tough for Donald Trump to overturn the TikTok ban through legal action, he could affect how the law is enforced. Biden can also extend the deadline by up to 90 days, though this doesn’t seem likely given that he is responsible for the legislation in the first place. As pointed out by Reuters , ByteDance would have a “heavy burden” to show the Biden administration that it had made “significant progress toward a divestiture needed to trigger the extension.” Barring that, it would fall upon Trump to reverse the decision in some way. One of the main difficulties of Trump halting the ban comes from the January 19 deadline coming a day before his official inauguration, as noted by Al Jazeera . While Trump attempted to ban the platform outright by executive order in 2020, it faced numerous legal challenges and by the time it reached the Biden administration it was transformed into the law in question. Since then, though, Trump stated during his 2024 presidential campaign that he has vowed to save it and even joined the platform , where he has over 14 million followers and more than 100 million likes. In addition, his nominees of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for health secretary and Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence are both on TikTok and don’t agree with the ban. If Trump wants to follow through with his promise, he has several options in preventing TikTok from being banned outright over time. Anupam Chander, an expert on global tech regulations at Georgetown Law, says that in the long term the president-elect could help ByteDance change its policies on TikTok to consider security concerns. Trump could also assist in having the company find a US buyer to comply with the law. Another expert, staff attorney George Wang at Columbia University, similarly told Vox that the language in the ban law is broad enough that it grants “the president some leeway to decline to enforce the ban if TikTok or ByteDance comes to some sufficient solution.” Chinese officials would be more open to a sale if Trump lowers his threat to impose additional tariffs on China , according to James Lewis of the Center for Strategic and International Studios via NPR . Trump could also greatly influence how the TikTok ban law is enforced, effectively neutering its effect. Civil liberties director David Greene from the Electronic Frontier Foundation says the incoming president could “instruct the US Justice Department to drop or modify its defense in the lawsuit with ByteDance or instruct the US Department of Commerce not to enforce the law.” TikTok is expected to appeal this decision by the federal appeals court to the Supreme Court. Free speech organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union says that the ruling “blatantly violates the First Amendment rights of millions of Americans.” It’s unclear, however, whether the Supreme Court would be able to hear the appeal and decide on the case before the January 19 deadline comes to pass. Still, if the appeal is granted, Trump could influence and modify how the DOJ argues its case before the Supreme Court in its defense. Nick Tan is a SEO Lead Writer for GameRevolution. Once upon a time, his parents took away his Super Nintendo as a punishment. He has sworn revenge ever since. Share article
The Australian government's support for a UN resolution calling for an end to Israel's occupation of Gaza is to blame for a widely condemned arson attack on a Melbourne synagogue, the Jewish state's prime minister says. or signup to continue reading It is impossible to separate the reprehensible arson attack from the federal government's "extreme anti-Israeli position," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu posted on social media early on Saturday. "Including the scandalous decision to support the UN resolution calling on Israel 'to bring an end to its unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, as rapidly as possible', and preventing a former Israeli minister from entering the country," he wrote on X. "The burning of the Adass Israel synagogue in Melbourne is an abhorrent act of antisemitism," he said. The Adass Israel synagogue at Rippon Lea in Melbourne's southeast had two of its three buildings gutted after suspected masked intruders allegedly broke into the building and set it alight in the early hours of Friday. Two congregants preparing for morning prayers, were inside. They were evacuated, with one sustaining minor injuries. Police have not ruled out terrorism as a motive, believing the attack was targeted. The suspects had poured accelerant on the floor inside the synagogue and set it on fire before fleeing when they were disturbed by a congregant, police said. Israel President Isaac Herzog said he firmly condemned the horrific arson amid an intolerable wave of attacks on Jewish communities when he spoke to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Friday night. "I noted to the prime minister that this rise and the increasingly serious antisemitic attacks on the Jewish community required firm and strong action, and that this was a message that must be heard clearly from Australia's leaders," he said. "I thanked him for his ongoing efforts to combat antisemitism, and expressed my trust that the local law enforcement would do everything in their power to bring the perpetrators to justice." Political and religious leaders have widely condemned the attack on the synagogue, built by Holocaust survivors. Mr Albanese said he had no tolerance for antisemitism. "This deliberate, unlawful attack goes against everything we are as Australians and everything we have worked so hard to build as a nation," he said in a statement. Australian Federal Police will provide all requested resources to Victorian authorities, he said. Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan said police patrols would be increased, and pledged $100,000 to rebuilding the synagogue. Advertisement Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date. We care about the protection of your data. Read our . Advertisement
UnitedHealthcare CEO kept a low public profile. Then he was shot to death in New YorkThe U.S. believes journalist Austin Tice is alive after disappearing in Syria in 2012, Biden says
Intel's interim co-CEO Zinsner says new chief executive will have foundry experienceRangers 1-1 Tottenham PLAYER RATINGS: Who played his heart out? Which superstar was hooked at half-time? Who won the managerial battle? Click here to visit the Scotland home page for the latest news and sport By PAUL FORSYTH Published: 22:57, 12 December 2024 | Updated: 23:18, 12 December 2024 e-mail 60 shares View comments A second-half equaliser by substitute Dejan Kulusevski denied Rangers a famous victory over Tottenham in a breathless Europa League Battle of Britain at Ibrox. Hamza Igamane gave the courageous Scottish Premiership side a deserved lead just after the interval and piled pressure on under-fire Spurs manager Ange Postecoglou . But the Australian made a flurry of substitutions and rescued a valuable point at the ground where he had many a battle during two years as the manager of Celtic . With 11 points from six games, both sides are on course to reach the knockout stage, but it was Rangers who took most of the credit from a compelling encounter, especially as they look ahead to Sunday's Premier Sports Cup final against Celtic. Paul Forsyth analyses the individual performances on both sides. Hamza Igamane celebrates his goal with Nicolas Raskin in Rangers' 1-1 draw with Tottenham Rangers winger Vaclav Cerny posed a threat throughout their Europa League match at Ibrox Spurs keeper Fraser Forster made several big saves, including one that denied Cyriel Dessers RANGERS Jack Butland - 7 Strong and alert. Denied Porro and Johnson with his body, although he was wrong-footed by the equaliser. James Tavernier - 7 His cross set up Igamane’s goal. For all the questions about his defensive ability, he was diligent in the tackle. John Souttar - 5 Solid start but pulled up with no-one around him and hobbled off before half-time. A worry ahead of the cup final. Robin Propper - 7 Might have been unsettled by Souttar’s departure but stuck to the task, kept his position and made some key blocks. Jefte - 6 Got forward well and swung in some lovely crosses. Nearly beat his own goalkeeper with a misjudged header. Nicolas Raskin - 8 Another dynamic, hard-working dislay in which he covered every blade of grass. Played his heart out. Mohamed Diomande - 6 Bright and positive. Had a shot deflected just wide. Booked for a handball, he will miss Rangers’ next Europa game. Vaclav Cerny - 8 Took on his opponents at will, cut inside and frequently got shots away. Twice had angled efforts parried by the keeper. Nedim Bajrami - 7 Seemed to enjoy the No 10 role. Had a crisp shot tipped over, but inexplicably pulled out when Jefte laid one on a plate. Ridvan Yilmaz - 7 Deployed wide on the left, high up the pitch, the full-back was a bright, lively presence. Also carried a goal threat. Hamza Igamane - 7 Had great, quick feet through the middle. A little lacking in physicality but took his chance superbly well. Philippe Clement - 8 One or two surprise selections were proved right. Could not have got more from his players. SUBSTITUTES: Balogun (Souttar, 35), Barron (Bahrami, 68), Sterling (Cerny, 68), Dessers (Igamane, 79), Fraser (Yilmaz 80). Not used: Kelly, Cortes, Dowell, King, McCausland, Rice, Curtis TOTTENHAM Fraser Forster - 8 Jeered throughout, the former Celtic keeper had a busy night. The pick of several saves was the late one to deny Dessers. Pedro Porro - 6 Lost his bearings for the goal, allowing Igamane space to score. Drew a fine save from Butland with an angled shot. Archie Gray - 7 So smooth and composed on the ball that he was almost over-confident, losing possession at times. Radu Dragusin - 7 A strong, physical presence, but he was stretched, most notably when he was booked for pulling back Yilmaz. Destiny Udogie - 6 Given an uncomfortable time by Cerny in the first half. Was dragged out of position a bit too easily. Rodrigo Bentancur - 6 Serving a seven-match ban from domestic football, his return to the fray didn’t really have the desired impact. Y ves Bissouma - 7 Made plenty of safe, successful passes but the midfield was much more intense after he was subsituted. James Maddison - 7 Showed more ambition than his team-mates, roaming the midfield and trying his luck from distance. Brennan Johnson - 6 Never took full advantage of an open game. Had one big chance, but he failed to wrap his foot round it. Son Heung-min - 6 The captain and key striker had a quiet night. Rarely got a sight of goal, even when his team upped their game. Timo Werner- 4 Despite curling an early shot over, never got going, lost confidence and made poor decisions. Subbed at half-time. Ange Postecoglou - 6 Must be worried that that his team lacked intensity but his subs made a big difference. SUBSTITUTES: Kulusevski (Werner, 46), Solanke (Johnson, 60), Sarr (Bentancur, 60), Bergvall (Bissoume, 60). Not used: Austin, Whiteman, Lankshear, Dorrington, Olusesi, Williams-Barnett, Hardy Referee: Sandro Scharer (Switzerland) - 6 Dejan Kulusevski Share or comment on this article: Rangers 1-1 Tottenham PLAYER RATINGS: Who played his heart out? Which superstar was hooked at half-time? Who won the managerial battle? e-mail 60 shares Add commentWho is Abu Mohammed al-Golani, the leader of the insurgency that toppled Syria’s Assad?
It’s AEW pay-per-view week, so you know what that means: Uncrowned’s Horsemen are riding again ahead of "Full Gear" this weekend. Kel Dansby, Drake Riggs, Pen Shamrock and Anthony Sulla-Heffinger are tackling some of the burning questions heading into AEW’s penultimate pay-per-view of the season. Since , the landscape of AEW has changed dramatically, with AEW World Champion Jon Moxley’s Death Riders running roughshod over the roster, setting the stage for an eventful Saturday night. This time around, these ponies are adding a new trick — predictions — which we almost certainly won’t hold over each others’ heads as an unofficial ranking of the Uncrowned wrestling scribes. With all the intro mumbo jumbo out of the way, let’s get to what everyone is really here for: The takes. The TBS title was created for Jade Cargill. She walked so Kris Statlander could run, and run she did ... but not for long enough. I want to see the former champ Statlander reclaim her throne and I think she will. It's too perfect of a setting. Statlander is back at "Full Gear," where she lost it a year ago (without getting pinned), and there's Kamille's impending (and justified) turn on Mercedes Moné coming. This all tracks. We have to get to Moné's pursuit of the world title sooner rather than later anyway. A feud with Mariah May would be absolutely brilliant — after a Kamille feud, of course. I don't necessarily love that a Statlander win will come from that Kamille turn — she doesn't need it to be able to beat Moné — but I'll take it. Statlander is awesome and fits significantly better as TBS queen. I’m with Drake on this one — it’s time for a new TBS Champion. Moné’s run hasn’t been bad, and she does need a trilogy match with Willow Nightingale, but that can come down the line. The seeds have been planted for a Kamille turn — hopefully she just walks away from Moné instead of putting her hands on her, which would diminish a Statlander win — so I would like to see that play out Saturday. Moné has enough clout and name recognition that even with a loss she’ll be a credible opponent higher up on the card. Statlander deserves this moment in front of a semi-hometown crowd. It’s tough to pinpoint a title that feels destined to change hands at Full Gear. Honestly, I’d cheat and suggest adding Chris Jericho to the card just so he could drop the ROH Title to Tomohiro Ishii. If you missed you’re missing a gem. Since that’s not on the table, my pick would be Daniel Garcia dethroning Jack Perry for the TNT Championship. The EVP storyline has fizzled out, and Perry’s momentum from his NJPW return earlier this year has all but disappeared. , and this would be the perfect way to launch his next chapter with the company. Moné's TBS Championship run hasn't been particularly compelling, and while she might need a fresh story, she does need the title. She’s established enough to do a campaign that doesn’t involve a belt, though AEW might feel forced to keep her in title contention if her as the rumors said. Maybe this is like when an NFL team throws millions at a quarterback so they’re obligated to play ‘em — either way, main event moves make more sense for Moné than continuing this run with the TBS strap. Plus, Kris Statlander would benefit, as would Kamille, if she’s the one to sabotage her friend and step out of Moné’s shadow. I would remove Hangman vs. Switchblade. The match will surely be entertaining considering the talent involved, but we just saw this at "WrestleDream." Give more time to other matches or just shorten the runtime of the show as a whole. You could really sell a special episode of Dynamite/Rampage/Collision with this as the main event instead. This might be an extreme take, but Orange Cassidy as Jon Moxley's challenger. I like what they've done with a serious Cassidy and I think he's a great, fun wrestler, and these two work great together. There's just no way in hell I ever see Cassidy becoming a world champion, especially as the character we've primarily known him as. Similar to my feelings on the TBS title, if the belt changes hands, it would probably be from a Wheeler Yuta interference and turn. We know the absolute coward will never do that, though. Just go away, Yuta. OK, so, Mariah May won the Women's Championship on August 25. That will be 90 days ago. The time for a victory lap is long gone. I’d scrap the Champagne Celebration bit and replace it with — stay with me, because this is wild — an actual wrestling match where May defends the title. AEW hasn’t addressed why Darby Allin won the Royal Rampage match on "AEW Rampage" (July 26), earning a world title shot at "Dynamite: Grand Slam" (September 25), but ended up wrestling Moxley instead. Moxley defeated Allin, then challenged Bryan Danielson at WrestleDream, winning the AEW World Championship for the fourth time. There’s no logical reason for Allin to be OK with Moxley’s reign. And why has Orange Cassidy suddenly jumped ahead as Moxley’s next challenger? The main event should be Allin vs. Moxley — both to avenge his September loss and to retaliate for the beatdown on Danielson. It’s a story begging to be told. Swerve Strickland falls to Bobby Lashley and is then ambushed by the Hurt Syndicate. But just when things seem bleak, his former tag team partner, Keith Lee, returns. Lee helps fend off the attack, setting the stage for a dramatic staredown with Lashley. This moment revives the tension between Swerve and Lee from 2022 while giving them a common enemy heading into 2025. Ricochet helps Bobby Lashley beat Swerve Strickland and joins the Hurt Syndicate. Is that even off the wall enough? How about this — Toni Storm returns? Nah, that still doesn’t feel wacky enough. OK, final answer — Samoa Joe comes back and we see him face-to-face with Moxley. MJF and Adam Cole have some big master plan and are still the bestest of friends, screwing over Roddy Strong in the process. The more I think about it, I've talked myself into it. This would be close to perfect, as I've wanted the "real" Cole to re-emerge as has been teased and I've pointed out in recent "AEW Dynamite" episode recaps. A form of that would be going this direction, albeit a different way to get to his goal of taking out MJF. For the record, I do think Drake nailed his “off the wall” prediction, so much so that I believe it’s going to happen. Anyway, my OTW call is that Kenny Omega returns and saves Orange Cassidy from a major beatdown after the main event. Omega recently returned to NJPW after a lengthy absence, and as Moxley tries to mold AEW into his vision, who better to thwart him than someone who actually helped start the company? Will Ospreay vs. Kyle Fletcher has all the makings of the night’s best match, so it should open the pay-per-view with a bang. Fletcher’s heel turn has been executed brilliantly, and AEW has a golden opportunity to solidify him as a major player with a hard-fought win over his former stablemate and mentor Ospreay. Jack Perry vs. Daniel Garcia for the TNT Championship. The stakes and action should be high enough to get the crowd going early. This is one of the most unpredictable matches on the card too, which works in its favor. Whichever one is going to end with a clean pinfall or submission. I get the sense this is going to be a night full of interference and hijinks, so before all of the shenanigans, can we just get one straight-up finish? That said, it also has to be entertaining and set a high bar. My best bet for a banger match with high potential to end free of shenanigans is Hangman Adam Page vs. Jay White, so that’s my ideal opener. High pace, big action, bad blood. Give me Ospreay vs. Fletcher, which should be a good time because Ospreay is always a good time. No offense, Kyle. It is what it is. This will be fun. Champagne problems, am I right? The real swerve here would be if went wrong, considering every major event like this in professional wrestling history has devolved into chaos. Toni Storm is playing coy, saying we’ve heard the last from her in professional wrestling. If done right, Storm returning Saturday would be an all-time women’s division moment in AEW — let some gray and black confetti drop, then have a video montage celebrating May’s run turn to black and white and boom, Storm’s music hits. I don't know how expected it might be, but I get some Chris Jericho-Kevin Owens festival of friendship vibes here. Therefore, Mina Shirakawa attacks Mariah, giving her the "celebration she'll never forget." That's a direct quote from this week's "AEW Dynamite," guys. Read into it! That woman wants a title, damnit! Friendships in wrestling are made to be broken. Talk about greed, eh? I also don't see much logic in Mariah turning on Mina, other than to remain a selfish lone wolf type. Will we see Toni Storm return? Possibly, but having her just appear to ruin things is the definition of a stereotypical wrestling history repeat. We've seen that to death. Please be more creative than that, AEW. Toni Storm’s “retirement” announcement last week feels far from permanent — it’s pro wrestling, after all. Expect Storm to crash May’s champagne celebration to thunderous applause, delivering an old-school, vintage beatdown to spoil the festivities. The Vendetta interrupts. As Big AJ , "Full Gear" is going down at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey. Considering , it’d make a ton of sense for her and Taya Valkyrie to pop up when the bottle popping pops off. It's been countless years since I sat down and ate a meal in Costco. The pizza might legitimately be the only food court item I've tried. I remember it being pretty good, but I'm not going to lie to you guys and say it was a groundbreaking, must-try delicacy. Let the stupid trends die, thank you. The year is 2055, Big Justice is supreme ruler and the Costco police are hunting for the leader of The Rizz-istance. I’m in a warehouse club prison because I slandered the Chicken Bake and Double Chunk Chocolate Cookie in an Uncrowned article in 2024. This is the Costco-verse future we face if Big Boom A.J. wins on Saturday. Anyway, it’s the pepperoni pizza. My go-to is a tie: The plain cheese slice — it smacks wayyyy more than the pepperoni — and the strawberry-purée sundae with vanilla soft serve. Together, it’s a five-star combo ... six if served in the Tokyo Dome! For the record, I'm actually looking forward to seeing how Big A.J. performs. My hope is that he has a botch-free showing and, even if he’s initially greeted with boos, he wins the audience over. Some folks are upset he's getting a shot, which I find silly. Like, I'm not saying A.J. is Dean Malenko, but I'm certain he has more moves in his arsenal than someone like a Bill G*ldberg who people are enamored with, so why not give the man a shot? Wait, what was the question? Oh yeah, the pizza. (That Costco glizzy is a close second, though.) Jon Moxley (Dansby, Riggs, Shamrock, Sulla-Heffinger) vs. Orange Cassidy Mercedes Mone (Dansby, Shamrock) vs. Kris Statlander (Riggs, Sulla-Heffinger) Private Party (Dansby, Riggs, Shamrock) vs. The Outrunners (Sulla-Heffinger) vs. The Acclaimed vs. Kings of the Black Throne Jack Perry (Shamrock) vs. Daniel Garcia (Dansby, Riggs, Sulla-Heffinger) Konosuke Takeshita (Dansby, Sulla-Heffinger) vs. Ricochet (Riggs, Shamrock) MJF (Dansby, Riggs, Shamrock, Sulla-Heffinger) vs. Roderick Strong Will Ospreay (Riggs, Shamrock, Sulla-Heffinger) vs. Kyle Fletcher (Dansby) Swerve Strickland vs. Bobby Lashley (Dansby, Riggs, Shamrock, Sulla-Heffinger) Jay White (Dansby, Riggs, Shamrock) vs. "Hangman" Adam Page (Sulla-Heffinger) "Big Boom" A.J. with Big Justice (Dansby, Riggs, Shamrock, Sulla-Heffinger) vs. Q.T. Marshall
“ Deep Dive ” is an in-depth podcast and video essay series featuring interviews with the stars and creative team behind an exceptional piece of filmmaking. For this edition, the IndieWire Crafts and Special Projects team partnered with Prime Video to take a closer look at “ The Boys ” with creator Eric Kripke, actor Antony Starr, production designer Mark Steel, costume designer Laura Jean Shannon, visual effects supervisor Stephan Szpak-Fleet, supervising stunt coordinator John Koyama, composers Christopher Lennertz and Matt Bowen, as well as editors David Kaldor and Scott Stolzar to examine the emotionally charged and shocking fourth season of the hit series. When it comes to “The Boys,” you can expect the unexpected. Since its inception, creator Eric Kripke has adapted Garth Ennis and Darick Robertson’s comic book series into a standout among superhero offerings. The Prime Video series is beloved for its dark humor and imaginative violence, but it keeps audiences watching because of its intelligent writing, unforgettable characters, superb acting, and engaging storylines that are rife with conflict and emotional resonance. In Season 4, the complexity of the characters is pushed even further as they’re forced to question wounds from their past. Kripke, actor Antony Starr, and eight members of the creative team spoke to IndieWire about how they were able to weave emotionally charged themes to deepen our understanding of the characters without losing sight of what makes “The Boys” an entertaining satire. In the videos below, watch how those involved in the series developed the engrossing backstories through production design, costumes, score, editing, and visual effects. One might not think death-defying superheroes spend much time considering their own mortality, but such was the case in the fourth season of “The Boys.” Creator Eric Kripke told IndieWire that Season 4 was meant to be “the low point for the characters” where each one confronts “the trauma that really defines them.” For Homelander, played by Antony Starr, the dream of a brighter future prompts a return to a traumatic past. “His humanity has always been his kryptonite. As much as he wants to be a god, he’s always been aware that he’s human,” Starr told IndieWire. “That mortality being on display and the sense of legacy really drives all of what he does through the whole season. He’s really concerned about what’s gonna happen when he dies.” Starr brilliantly captures the weight of the character’s internal conflict, culminating in a terrifying sequence during which Homelander seeks revenge on a group of Vought researchers who conducted experiments on him as a child. In creating the ominous moment, production designer Mark Steel found inspiration from the “Cold War era” to give shape to the laboratory sets, adding nuanced details to heighten the realism. “We put all the dents at kid height and made it sort of feel like this was a familiar place he’d been in before,” Steel told IndieWire. And the composers enhanced the tension twofold. “The tension is so crazy, to think that everyone knows: just the slightest flinch and you’re dead,” said Christopher Lennertz, who worked alongside fellow composer Matt Bowen. “Musically, there’s a lot of things that we took a pause for and it was to have it be this breathing of like, oh my god, tension, tension, tension. Oh, maybe he’s not gonna kill him. And it’s this back and forth.” There are plenty of gruesome deaths in the sequence, including a memorable cremation with a live scientist. “When you’re meeting people, I always ask for as much practical fire as possible. So the very last shot of that sequence was the dummy on the ground,” VFX supervisor Stephan Szpak-Fleet said. “It was a mixture of Indiana Jones and OG face melts and having done so many burning bodies and melty, gross shit for this show by now.” “The way he comes in and the way he goes out are the key moments,” Starr noted of the sequence. “Because he goes in really not knowing what’s gonna come out of it. And then in the elevator on the way out, that smile was everything. That’s like therapy.” In the video above, watch the team break down Homelander’s complicated relationship to his own humanity — and how he handles it. As costume designer Laura Jean Shannon pointed out, “In this season, we built new suits — we took away the flap that he’s had since Season 1, that was his ability to loosen up.” Akin to Homelander, Billy Butcher, stoically portrayed by Karl Urban, faces his own moral dilemma. Does he walk the path of righteousness or release his inner demon? In shaping the character’s arc, Kripke separated Butcher from his group of ragtag partners, leaving him to think about how to make things right with his adoptive son Ryan (Cameron Crovetti). “We knew that Butcher was going to spend so much time alone and he has a literal angel and devil on his shoulder. One character who’s telling him, ‘Show love, show mercy,’ and then he has another who’s like, just become a monster,” Kripke told IndieWire. Crafting the juxtaposition was a key development early on. “He’s really down in the dumps at the beginning of Season 4, and we’ve got hints that he’s losing his mind but maybe hasn’t completely gotten there yet,” noted editor David Kaldor. The angel on his shoulder is his deceased wife, Becca (Shantel VanSanten), while a new character, Joe Kessler (Jeffrey Dean Morgan), plays his devil, who, in a late reveal, turns out to be a figment of Butcher’s imagination. The haunting revelation plays out through a montage of moments where Butcher believes he’s talking to Kessler, but in fact, no one is there. “When he starts to go through the flashbacks, we have this, like, rhythmic piece of distortion that just starts to loop on itself and starts to feedback on itself,” said composer Matt Bowen. “Kessler represents all the bad stuff in Butcher,” editor Scott Stolzar said. “He tried, and he failed, and he immediately reverts back to the absolute worst version of himself.” The event that firmly turns Butcher to the dark side is seeing Ryan send CIA officer Grace Mallory (Laila Robins) through a brick wall. “It’s such an emotional moment. Kripke and I talk about it all the time, some things, kept simple and just fast and violent, hit harder than all kinds of fancy moves and fancy wire work,” said supervising stunt coordinator John Koyama about creating the tragic death of the character. “For Butcher, it feels like a line that Ryan has crossed that he won’t come back from. And if he doesn’t have Ryan, then what the hell is he holding onto his humanity for? That’s when Butcher accepts that fate,” revealed Kripke. Part of what “They Boys” does so well is seamlessly introducing new characters, whether it’s a minor one like Will Ferrell making a cameo as a coach in a Vought-produced film or a major one, like Sister Sage (Susan Howard), the mastermind behind Homelander’s political rise. But no one made a bigger impact this season than Firecracker (Valorie Curry), a right-wing “truth bomber” who cozies up to Homelander as part of the Seven. The political mouthpiece becomes a sore spot for Annie (Erin Moriarty), revealing some of her darkest secrets. “There’s a lot of political figures that are folded into Firecracker,” said Kripke. “A big one, though, is the QAnon movement and just this overall notion of these unfounded conspiracy theories based on misinformation and social media and how they metastasize into this very frightening worldview.” In designing her super suit, costume designer Laura Jean Shannon infused a red, white, and blue color scheme with a customized camo jumpsuit as the base. Leather was infused into the creation along with metal accents and an ammo belt across her chest. “When Vought gets their hands on Firecracker, they take aspects of her costume that she wore, and they bake the DNA of that into their bells and whistles version of the Seven branded super suit,” explained Shannon. Similar thought went into designing her televised special “Truth Bomb.” “The whole idea of that stage set up was this guerrilla event happening across the street,” noted production designer Mark Steel. “Putting her brand in full relief behind, putting it on the floor, so that in every shot, you’re just entirely immersed in her brand. It was a graphic design approach that we took and it was for television.” Before Firecracker and Annie go toe-to-toe, supervising stunt coordinator John Koyama spoke with the actors to find the emotional undertones of the scene to “drive the action.” “It was just so great seeing Annie be a badass in her little quasi-preppy sports coat,” said Shannon. “And there was something really amazing about this sort of clashing of good and evil, but the one that deserved the beating was in her patriotic red, white, and blue.”
Nvidia’s Next Move: A Chip Ahead of Its Time? Big Surprise for 2026BOULDER, Colo. — A 72-year-old lifelong Colorado fan with end-stage kidney failure waited to the side of the field in his wheelchair for Travis Hunter and the rest of the Buffaloes. One by one, players strolled over and signed a football for Riley Rhoades, his face lighting up with each signature. Standing close by and taking in the scene was Jeremy Bloom. He's become a wish facilitator for older adults. Bloom, the former Colorado wide receiver and Olympic freestyle skier, started the Wish of a Lifetime foundation in 2008, which has made thousands of aspirations turn into reality for older adults. The list of granted wishes range from taking veterans back to the beaches of Normandy to helping late-in-life authors publish a book. He's staged concerts for musicians, assisted some in daredevil feats such as jumping out of an airplane and even lined up a meeting between an Olympic medalist and former President Barack Obama. For Rhoades, his wish was simply to return to Folsom Field again, the place where he used to have season tickets but hasn't attended a game since 2004. "Everybody has somebody in their life —a grandparent, friend, neighbor — at that age where you wish you had more resources to help," said Bloom, whose college career was cut short two decades ago when the NCAA denied his reinstatement to play football and still ski professionally after receiving endorsement money to fuel his Olympic dreams. "Nothing can compare to seeing someone else's eyes light up because you helped make their dream come true." Granting wishes The foundation is a tribute to his grandparents. But the concept began to take root when he was a teenager. He was in Japan for a World Cup freestyle skiing competition when a woman tried to hop on a crowded bus. There was no room, but everyone in front rose from their seats to make space. That stuck with him, along with seeing these acts of kindness for older adults all over Europe and Asia as he traveled. An idea formed — bring that same level of appreciation to the United States, with a wish-granting element. Bloom's organization has been a charitable affiliate of AARP since 2020. Special moment It was the yearning of Rhoades that brought the two of them to Folsom Field last weekend. Rhoades, who had season tickets at Colorado for 27 years, wanted to see the Buffaloes in person after watching the team's resurgence on television. A few years ago, Rhoades, who was born with spina bifida, was diagnosed with end-stage renal failure. Being among the 54,646 fans Saturday stirred up plenty of emotions for Rhoades, as he watched the 16th-ranked Buffaloes (8-2, 6-1 Big 12, No. 16 CFP) beat Utah. Colorado remains in the race for not only a conference title but a spot in the College Football Playoff. "It's just great to be back here again," Rhoades said as he pointed out the section where he used to watch games. "It's just ... so cool." For Bloom, the success that coach Deion Sanders has brought to the program means more reunions with teammates as they pass through town. "I've been through many years where nobody comes to visit," Bloom said. "It's fun that Boulder has become the epicenter of college football." Paying athletes Leading the way for Colorado this season have been quarterback Shedeur Sanders and two-way star Hunter, who's the Heisman Trophy frontrunner. But what particularly pleases Bloom is that Sanders, Hunter and the rest of college football players are able to finally profit through name, image and likeness. In his day, Bloom got caught in the NCAA crosshairs for wanting to play both sports and to have sponsors in one (skiing) so he could fund his Olympic aspirations. How time have changed. "I'm just really grateful that this generation of athletes gets to monetize their skills and ability," said Bloom, who finished sixth in moguls at the 2006 Winter Games in Italy. "It's the right thing." He's thrown his passion into fulfilling wishes such as learning ballet, riding in a Formula 1 pace car or taking a flight in a fighter jet. He's also helped reconnect families and friends, including a reunion for a trio of centenarian sisters who hadn't seen each other in more than a decade. This granted wish has stuck with Bloom: A person in Alabama wasn't able to travel after being diagnosed with end-of-life emphysema. So he asked for postcards to be sent, just to learn what made someone's town so special. He received 2,000 postcards from 26 different countries. "There's no end to the things that they've done for us in the world," Bloom said of older adults. "We're one of the organizations that reminds them that their dreams still do matter and that we still appreciate them and we cherish them."
UnitedHealthcare CEO kept a low public profile. Then he was shot to death in New YorkAbout 75,000 homes with approved development applications across Greater Sydney have not commenced construction, underscoring the state government’s struggle to tackle the housing crisis in the face of tough economic conditions. Weeks after NSW Labor revealed its latest major planning reform, a three-person development authority to expedite approval times, Planning Minister Paul Scully conceded the success of any regulatory change was dependent on economic pressures subsiding. “We acknowledge that macroeconomic conditions are tough at the moment, but the need for more housing is too urgent, and when economic conditions shift, the planning system needs to be at its most effective and efficient,” Scully said. Premier Chris Minns wants to fast-track higher-density development in Sydney. Economic headwinds are undermining his reforms. Credit: The scale of the housing challenge confronting NSW has only intensified since Premier Chris Minns took government in March last year. After committing to build 263,000 homes across Greater Sydney by July 2029, departmental forecasts now expect only 151,670 will be constructed in that time. NSW needs to build 75,000 homes a year for the next five years to meet its commitments under the National Housing Accord. Last month, the Herald revealed only 45 per cent of 895 approved development applications for large-scale housing projects – builds with at least 19 new dwellings – had obtained construction certificates by March this year , according to an analysis by University of Sydney Emeritus Professor Peter Phibbs, reflecting the broad economic challenges faced by the development industry. The stalled applications represented 47,536 dwellings, more than double the net completions in the previous year to June. But further figures obtained by this masthead under freedom of information laws highlight how economic headwinds are not just affecting projects with large capital costs, but all types of housing, showing proponents with approved development applications of all sizes were delaying or jettisoning construction plans. In NSW, 13,687 development applications were approved since 2021-22 but had not begun construction as of March 10, data from the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure shows. The stalled projects would provide 75,205 dwellings. University of NSW City Futures Research Centre director Professor Bill Randolph said the sheer number of approved development applications demonstrated the problem with fixating reform on the planning system, saying there was a greater counter-cyclical role for government to play in delivering affordable housing. “It’s the market, not the planning system, that determines the rate of which stuff gets built. That’s becoming more and more evident,” he said, adding that the current downturn in the economic cycle had been exacerbated by the pandemic, migration, and then inflation. “We’re just chasing our tails if we think reforming the planning system is going to solve this.” The department’s data, updated in late October, showed net completions over the preceding 12 months to June had plunged to just above 21,000, 18 per cent below the previous five financial years’ average. In a bright spot for the government, October experienced the highest number of approvals since May 2023, nearly 35 per cent more than the preceding month. Last month, Minns said that dealing with construction feasibility across Greater Sydney was a “complex issue”, but he noted that access to finance and capital was “harder to get today than it has been for decades”. Scully said the government was doing everything in our remit to “streamline the planning system”, smoothing out kinks in the development pipeline that were slowing down housing delivery. “Of course we want building commencements to align with housing approvals, but this comes down to development feasibility, labour costs, interest rates, building material costs and sometimes consent conditions,” he said. Shadow planning minister Scott Farlow said the problem appeared to be especially affecting Sydney, noting the number of development application approvals not commenced had increased by 18 per cent over the last year while falling in other capital cities. He criticised the government’s imposition of a housing and productivity tax on developments last year, saying it had exacerbated the city’s feasibility crisis as increases in the cost of construction and land outpace apartment prices. Property Council NSW executive director Katie Stevenson said getting shovels in the ground was proving difficult across Greater Sydney, blaming high government taxes and charges, as well as “delays in post-approval decision-making”, such as when acquiring additional approvals and licences from agencies such as Sydney Water. “Without government action to make it economically viable for the property sector to build more homes, the housing crisis is only going to get worse,” she said. “The NSW government can’t control all the costs preventing housing delivery, but one lever they can pull is to put a temporary pause on newly introduced additional taxes and charges on development during the National Housing Accord period to kickstart the housing delivery communities need.” The Morning Edition newsletter is our guide to the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up here .
WALTHAM, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec 6, 2024-- Vicarious Surgical Inc. (“Vicarious Surgical” or the “Company”) (NYSE: RBOT, RBOT WS), a next-generation robotics technology company seeking to improve lives by transforming robotic surgery, today announced the pending departure of William Kelly, its Chief Financial Officer (CFO), to pursue other career opportunities, after nearly four years of dedicated service with the Company. Mr. Kelly has served as Vicarious Surgical’s CFO since January 2021. He will assist the Company to ensure minimal disruption and a successful transition of responsibilities prior to his departure, which is slated for January 2, 2025. “On behalf of the Company and Board, I want to extend my sincerest gratitude to Bill for his significant contribution over the last few years,” said Adam Sachs, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer. “Bill has been an incredible asset to Vicarious Surgical, and we wish him all the best in his future endeavors.” Mr. Kelly added “My tenure at Vicarious Surgical has been a period of significant progress and accomplishment, both for the Company and for me personally. I am deeply grateful for the opportunities I have been afforded and the collaborative spirit of the entire team. I depart with immense pride in our collective achievements and unwavering confidence in the Company's continued success under its strong leadership.” The Company has initiated a CFO succession process and will provide updates as appropriate. About Vicarious Surgical Founded in 2014, Vicarious Surgical is a next generation robotics company, developing a unique disruptive technology with the multiple goals of substantially increasing the efficiency of surgical procedures, improving patient outcomes, and reducing healthcare costs. The Company’s novel surgical approach uses proprietary human-like surgical robots to virtually transport surgeons inside the patient to perform minimally invasive surgery. The Company is led by an experienced team of technologists, medical device professionals and physicians, and is backed by technology luminaries including Bill Gates, Vinod Khosla’s Khosla Ventures, Innovation Endeavors, Jerry Yang’s AME Cloud Ventures, Sun Hung Kai & Co. Ltd and Philip Liang’s E15 VC. The Company is headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts. Learn more at www.vicarioussurgical.com . Forward-Looking Statements This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The company’s actual results may differ from its expectations, estimates, and projections and, consequently, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained herein, are forward-looking statements that reflect the current beliefs and expectations of management. These forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Most of these factors are outside Vicarious Surgical’s control and are difficult to predict. Factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to: the ability to maintain the listing of Vicarious Surgical’s Class A common stock on the New York Stock Exchange; the approval, commercialization and adoption of Vicarious Surgical’s initial product candidates and the success of its single-port surgical robot, called the Vicarious Surgical System, and any of its future product candidates and service offerings; changes in applicable laws or regulations; the ability of Vicarious Surgical to raise financing in the future; the success, cost and timing of Vicarious Surgical’s product and service development activities; the potential attributes and benefits of Vicarious Surgical’s product candidates and services; Vicarious Surgical’s ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approval for the Vicarious Surgical System, and any related restrictions and limitations of any approved product; the size and duration of human clinical trials for the Vicarious Surgical System; Vicarious Surgical’s ability to identify, in-license or acquire additional technology; Vicarious Surgical’s ability to maintain its existing license, manufacture, supply and distribution agreements; Vicarious Surgical’s ability to compete with other companies currently marketing or engaged in the development of products and services that Vicarious Surgical is currently marketing or developing; the size and growth potential of the markets for Vicarious Surgical’s product candidates and services, and its ability to serve those markets, either alone or in partnership with others; the pricing of Vicarious Surgical’s product candidates and services and reimbursement for medical procedures conducted using its product candidates and services; the company’s estimates regarding expenses, revenue, capital requirements and needs for additional financing; Vicarious Surgical’s financial performance; economic downturns, political and market conditions and their potential to adversely affect Vicarious Surgical’s business, financial condition and results of operations; Vicarious Surgical’s intellectual property rights and its ability to protect or enforce those rights, and the impact on its business, results and financial condition if it is unsuccessful in doing so; and other risks and uncertainties indicated from time to time in Vicarious Surgical’s filings with the SEC. Vicarious Surgical cautions that the foregoing list of factors is not exclusive. The company cautions readers not to place undue reliance upon any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Vicarious Surgical does not undertake or accept any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect any change in its expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. View source version on businesswire.com : https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241206242926/en/ CONTACT: Investors Kaitlyn Brosco Vicarious Surgical Kbrosco@vicarioussurgical.com Media Inquiries media@vicarioussurgical.com KEYWORD: MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES NORTH AMERICA INDUSTRY KEYWORD: MEDICAL SUPPLIES TECHNOLOGY OTHER HEALTH HEALTH ROBOTICS HEALTH TECHNOLOGY OTHER TECHNOLOGY MEDICAL DEVICES HOSPITALS SURGERY HARDWARE SOURCE: Vicarious Surgical Inc. Copyright Business Wire 2024. PUB: 12/06/2024 04:05 PM/DISC: 12/06/2024 04:05 PM http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241206242926/en
EW COURT UPDATE: The Edwards Lifesciences Class Action Deadline is December 13 –Investors with Losses are Urged to Contact BFA Law (NYSE:EW)
Friendly reminder |
The authenticity of this information has not been verified by this website and is for your reference only. Please do not reprint without permission. If authorized by this website, it should be used within the scope of authorization and marked with "Source: this website". |
Special attention |
Some articles on this website are reprinted from other media. The purpose of reprinting is to convey more industry information, which does not mean that this website agrees with their views and is responsible for their authenticity. Those who make comments on this website forum are responsible for their own content. This website has the right to reprint or quote on the website. The comments on the forum do not represent the views of this website. If you need to use the information provided by this website, please contact the original author. The copyright belongs to the original author. If you need to contact this website regarding copyright, please do so within 15 days. |