9 million yen to php
9 million yen to php
Saturday, December 28, 2024 The United Kingdom has opened its Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) application process for citizens of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates starting 1 February 2024. This requirement applies to travelers planning visits to the UK on or after 22 February 2024. As part of the phased rollout, the ETA program streamlines entry for non-visa nationals, enhancing convenience and security. GCC nationals can now apply online for their ETA, which is valid for multiple entries over a set period. The application process involves submitting personal details, travel plans, and a small fee. Most approvals are granted within 72 hours, ensuring a smooth experience for applicants. This development underscores the UK commitment to strengthening travel ties with GCC countries while maintaining efficient border security. The ETA system aims to simplify travel, making the UK a more accessible destination for tourists, business travelers, and students. The United Kingdom’s Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) program is transforming the way travelers prepare for their trips. Introduced to streamline travel authorization for non-visa nationals, this phased rollout ensures seamless access to the UK’s borders. Designed to enhance security and improve efficiency, the ETA system offers a modernized approach to travel planning. This guide outlines key dates, eligibility, and essential details of the Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) process, allowing travelers to plan with confidence. Here’s everything you need to know about the Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) application process through 2025. Australian Travelers Will Face New Entry Fee for UK Visits Starting January 2025 as Part of Expanded Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) Scheme The Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) program is being implemented in carefully planned phases to ensure a smooth transition for both travelers and UK authorities. Each phase targets specific nationalities, gradually expanding the system’s coverage. Below are the specific timelines and eligibility details: The first phase of the Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) rollout began on 25 October 2023, targeting Qatari nationals. This group was chosen to pilot the program, providing valuable insights into the system’s functionality and effectiveness. Travelers from Qatar planning to visit the UK on or after 15 November 2023 are required to apply for an ETA. The pilot phase was designed to: For Qatari nationals, the application process involves submitting personal details, travel plans, and a small fee online. Most approvals are granted within a few days, ensuring minimal disruption to travel plans. This phase has set the foundation for the program’s subsequent expansion. South Korea Extends ETA Exemption for Singaporean Travelers Until End-2025 The second phase of the ETA rollout commenced on 1 February 2024, extending eligibility to citizens of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, including Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. Travelers from these nations must secure an ETA for visits to the UK starting on or after 22 February 2024. This phase is significant as it underscores the UK’s strong ties with GCC countries. These nations represent a growing segment of travelers to the UK, driven by tourism, business, and education. By implementing the ETA system for GCC nationals, the UK aims to: JCB Enhances UK Travel with New ETA Payment Solution for Cardholders GCC nationals benefit from the simplicity and efficiency of the ETA application process. The online platform allows applicants to: The GCC phase has further refined the ETA system, demonstrating its ability to manage higher application volumes while maintaining efficiency. This expansion also reflects the UK’s commitment to welcoming international visitors and ensuring their journey is as seamless as possible. The phased introduction of the Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) system is a testament to the UK’s forward-thinking approach to border management. By leveraging advanced technology and phased implementation, the program achieves multiple objectives: South Africa Enhances Travel Experience for Indian Tourists Easier Visa Process and Direct Flights Set to Transform Global Tourism As the Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) program progresses to subsequent phases, its success with Qatari and GCC nationals sets a strong precedent. The lessons learned will be instrumental in managing the program’s continued expansion, ultimately covering travelers from numerous countries worldwide by 2025. Read Travel Industry News in 104 different regional language platforms Get our daily dose of news, by subscribing to our newsletters. Subscribe here . Watch Travel And Tour World Interviews here . Read more Travel News , Daily Travel Alert , and Travel Industry News on Travel And Tour World only.Hezbollah leaders also signalled tentative backing for the US-brokered deal, which offers both sides an off-ramp from hostilities that have driven more than 1.2 million Lebanese and 50,000 Israelis from their homes. An intense bombing campaign by Israel has killed more than 3,700 people, many of them civilians, Lebanese officials say. But while the deal, set to take effect early Wednesday, could significantly calm the tensions that have inflamed the region, it does little directly to resolve the much deadlier war that has raged in Gaza since the Hamas attack on southern Israel in October 2023 that killed 1,200 people. Hezbollah, which began firing scores of rockets into Israel the following day in support of Hamas, has previously said it would keep fighting until there was a stop to the fighting in Gaza. Here’s what to know about the tentative ceasefire agreement and its potential implications: – The terms of the deal The agreement reportedly calls for a 60-day halt in fighting that would see Israeli troops retreat to their side of the border while requiring Hezbollah to end its armed presence in a broad swathe of southern Lebanon. Us President Joe Biden said on Tuesday that the deal is set to take effect at 4am local time on Wednesday. Under the deal, thousands of Lebanese troops and UN peacekeepers are to deploy to the region south of the Litani River. An international panel lead by the US would monitor compliance by all sides. Mr Biden said the deal “was designed to be a permanent cessation of hostilities.” Israel has demanded the right to act should Hezbollah violate its obligations. Lebanese officials have rejected writing that into the proposal. Israel’s defence minister, Israel Katz, insisted on Tuesday that the military would strike Hezbollah if the UN peacekeeping force, known as Unifil, does not provide “effective enforcement” of the deal. – Lingering uncertainty A Hezbollah leader said the group’s support for the deal hinged on clarity that Israel would not renew its attacks. “After reviewing the agreement signed by the enemy government, we will see if there is a match between what we stated and what was agreed upon by the Lebanese officials,” Mahmoud Qamati, deputy chair of Hezbollah’s political council, told the Qatari satellite news network Al Jazeera. “We want an end to the aggression, of course, but not at the expense of the sovereignty of the state” of Lebanon, he said. The European Union’s top diplomat, Josep Borrell, said on Tuesday that Israel’s security concerns had been addressed in the deal also brokered by France. – Where the fighting has left both sides After months of cross-border bombings, Israel can claim major victories, including the killing of Hezbollah’s top leader, Hassan Nasrallah, most of his senior commanders and the destruction of extensive militant infrastructure. A complex attack in September involving the explosion of hundreds of walkie-talkies and pagers used by Hezbollah was widely attributed to Israel, signalling a remarkable penetration of the militant group. The damage inflicted on Hezbollah has come not only in its ranks, but to the reputation it built by fighting Israel to a stalemate in the 2006 war. Still, its fighters managed to put up heavy resistance on the ground, slowing Israel’s advance while continuing to fire scores of rockets, missiles and drones across the border each day. The ceasefire offers relief to both sides, giving Israel’s overstretched army a break and allowing Hezbollah leaders to tout the group’s effectiveness in holding their ground despite Israel’s massive advantage in weaponry. But the group is likely to face a reckoning, with many Lebanese accusing it of tying their country’s fate to Gaza’s at the service of key ally Iran, inflicting great damage on a Lebanese economy that was already in a grave condition. – No answers for Gaza Until now, Hezbollah has insisted that it would only halt its attacks on Israel when it agreed to stop fighting in Gaza. Some in the region are likely to view a deal between the Lebanon-based group and Israel as a capitulation. In Gaza, where officials say the war has killed more than 44,000 Palestinians, Israel’s attacks have inflicted a heavy toll on Hamas, including the killing of the group’s top leaders. But Hamas fighters continue to hold scores of Israeli hostages, giving the militant group a bargaining chip if indirect ceasefire negotiations resume. Hamas is likely to continue to demand a lasting truce and a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza in any such deal. Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas offered a pointed reminder on Tuesday of the intractability of the war, demanding urgent international intervention. “The only way to halt the dangerous escalation we are witnessing in the region, and maintain regional and international stability, security and peace, is to resolve the question of Palestine,” he said in a speech to the UN read by his ambassador.On a rare two-game skid, No. 24 Arizona faces Davidson
Clemson adds top 50 QB to '25 recruiting class
How Trump’s bet on voters electing him managed to silence some of his legal woesLE MOYNE (2-5) Koroma 4-6 1-4 9, Owens 4-8 6-8 14, Carmody 4-9 4-4 13, Jones 1-3 0-0 3, Tekin 2-6 3-4 7, Dancler 0-2 0-1 0, Fouts 3-6 4-6 11, Mosquera 2-7 0-0 4. Totals 20-47 18-27 61. TEXAS A&M-CC (3-3) Clark 7-10 3-3 17, Dease 3-6 0-0 7, Parker 2-4 0-0 5, Walker 2-4 2-2 6, I.Williams 3-7 1-4 7, S.Williams 1-5 3-6 5, Dennis 4-6 2-2 13, Jackson 3-3 1-3 7, Potter 1-2 0-0 3, Roberts 2-3 0-0 5, Torbor 2-3 1-2 5, Villegas 1-1 0-0 2. Totals 31-54 13-22 82. Halftime_Texas A&M-CC 42-20. 3-Point Goals_Le Moyne 3-13 (Carmody 1-2, Fouts 1-2, Jones 1-3, Dancler 0-1, Owens 0-2, Mosquera 0-3), Texas A&M-CC 7-15 (Dennis 3-5, Parker 1-1, Potter 1-2, Roberts 1-2, Dease 1-3, Walker 0-2). Rebounds_Le Moyne 23 (Fouts 7), Texas A&M-CC 35 (Clark 7). Assists_Le Moyne 9 (Owens, Carmody 3), Texas A&M-CC 15 (I.Williams 6). Total Fouls_Le Moyne 17, Texas A&M-CC 22. A_881 (2,000).
WASHINGTON (AP) — As a former and potentially future president, Donald Trump hailed what would become Project 2025 as a road map for “exactly what our movement will do” with another crack at the White House. As the blueprint for a hard-right turn in America became a liability during the 2024 campaign, Trump pulled an about-face . He denied knowing anything about the “ridiculous and abysmal” plans written in part by his first-term aides and allies. Now, after being elected the 47th president on Nov. 5, Trump is stocking his second administration with key players in the detailed effort he temporarily shunned. Most notably, Trump has tapped Russell Vought for an encore as director of the Office of Management and Budget; Tom Homan, his former immigration chief, as “border czar;” and immigration hardliner Stephen Miller as deputy chief of policy . Those moves have accelerated criticisms from Democrats who warn that Trump's election hands government reins to movement conservatives who spent years envisioning how to concentrate power in the West Wing and impose a starkly rightward shift across the U.S. government and society. Trump and his aides maintain that he won a mandate to overhaul Washington. But they maintain the specifics are his alone. “President Trump never had anything to do with Project 2025,” said Trump spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt in a statement. “All of President Trumps' Cabinet nominees and appointments are whole-heartedly committed to President Trump's agenda, not the agenda of outside groups.” Here is a look at what some of Trump's choices portend for his second presidency. The Office of Management and Budget director, a role Vought held under Trump previously and requires Senate confirmation, prepares a president's proposed budget and is generally responsible for implementing the administration's agenda across agencies. The job is influential but Vought made clear as author of a Project 2025 chapter on presidential authority that he wants the post to wield more direct power. “The Director must view his job as the best, most comprehensive approximation of the President’s mind,” Vought wrote. The OMB, he wrote, “is a President’s air-traffic control system” and should be “involved in all aspects of the White House policy process,” becoming “powerful enough to override implementing agencies’ bureaucracies.” Trump did not go into such details when naming Vought but implicitly endorsed aggressive action. Vought, the president-elect said, “knows exactly how to dismantle the Deep State” — Trump’s catch-all for federal bureaucracy — and would help “restore fiscal sanity.” In June, speaking on former Trump aide Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast, Vought relished the potential tension: “We’re not going to save our country without a little confrontation.” The strategy of further concentrating federal authority in the presidency permeates Project 2025's and Trump's campaign proposals. Vought's vision is especially striking when paired with Trump's proposals to dramatically expand the president's control over federal workers and government purse strings — ideas intertwined with the president-elect tapping mega-billionaire Elon Musk and venture capitalist Vivek Ramaswamy to lead a “Department of Government Efficiency.” Trump in his first term sought to remake the federal civil service by reclassifying tens of thousands of federal civil service workers — who have job protection through changes in administration — as political appointees, making them easier to fire and replace with loyalists. Currently, only about 4,000 of the federal government's roughly 2 million workers are political appointees. President Joe Biden rescinded Trump's changes. Trump can now reinstate them. Meanwhile, Musk's and Ramaswamy's sweeping “efficiency” mandates from Trump could turn on an old, defunct constitutional theory that the president — not Congress — is the real gatekeeper of federal spending. In his “Agenda 47,” Trump endorsed so-called “impoundment,” which holds that when lawmakers pass appropriations bills, they simply set a spending ceiling, but not a floor. The president, the theory holds, can simply decide not to spend money on anything he deems unnecessary. Vought did not venture into impoundment in his Project 2025 chapter. But, he wrote, “The President should use every possible tool to propose and impose fiscal discipline on the federal government. Anything short of that would constitute abject failure.” Trump's choice immediately sparked backlash. “Russ Vought is a far-right ideologue who has tried to break the law to give President Trump unilateral authority he does not possess to override the spending decisions of Congress (and) who has and will again fight to give Trump the ability to summarily fire tens of thousands of civil servants,” said Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, a Democrat and outgoing Senate Appropriations chairwoman. Reps. Jamie Raskin of Maryland and Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico, leading Democrats on the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, said Vought wants to “dismantle the expert federal workforce” to the detriment of Americans who depend on everything from veterans' health care to Social Security benefits. “Pain itself is the agenda,” they said. Trump’s protests about Project 2025 always glossed over overlaps in the two agendas . Both want to reimpose Trump-era immigration limits. Project 2025 includes a litany of detailed proposals for various U.S. immigration statutes, executive branch rules and agreements with other countries — reducing the number of refugees, work visa recipients and asylum seekers, for example. Miller is one of Trump's longest-serving advisers and architect of his immigration ideas, including his promise of the largest deportation force in U.S. history. As deputy policy chief, which is not subject to Senate confirmation, Miller would remain in Trump's West Wing inner circle. “America is for Americans and Americans only,” Miller said at Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally on Oct. 27. “America First Legal,” Miller’s organization founded as an ideological counter to the American Civil Liberties Union, was listed as an advisory group to Project 2025 until Miller asked that the name be removed because of negative attention. Homan, a Project 2025 named contributor, was an acting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement director during Trump’s first presidency, playing a key role in what became known as Trump's “family separation policy.” Previewing Trump 2.0 earlier this year, Homan said: “No one’s off the table. If you’re here illegally, you better be looking over your shoulder.” John Ratcliffe, Trump's pick to lead the CIA , was previously one of Trump's directors of national intelligence. He is a Project 2025 contributor. The document's chapter on U.S. intelligence was written by Dustin Carmack, Ratcliffe's chief of staff in the first Trump administration. Reflecting Ratcliffe's and Trump's approach, Carmack declared the intelligence establishment too cautious. Ratcliffe, like the chapter attributed to Carmack, is hawkish toward China. Throughout the Project 2025 document, Beijing is framed as a U.S. adversary that cannot be trusted. Brendan Carr, the senior Republican on the Federal Communications Commission, wrote Project 2025's FCC chapter and is now Trump's pick to chair the panel. Carr wrote that the FCC chairman “is empowered with significant authority that is not shared” with other FCC members. He called for the FCC to address “threats to individual liberty posed by corporations that are abusing dominant positions in the market,” specifically “Big Tech and its attempts to drive diverse political viewpoints from the digital town square.” He called for more stringent transparency rules for social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube and “empower consumers to choose their own content filters and fact checkers, if any.” Carr and Ratcliffe would require Senate confirmation for their posts.
Friendly reminder |
The authenticity of this information has not been verified by this website and is for your reference only. Please do not reprint without permission. If authorized by this website, it should be used within the scope of authorization and marked with "Source: this website". |
Special attention |
Some articles on this website are reprinted from other media. The purpose of reprinting is to convey more industry information, which does not mean that this website agrees with their views and is responsible for their authenticity. Those who make comments on this website forum are responsible for their own content. This website has the right to reprint or quote on the website. The comments on the forum do not represent the views of this website. If you need to use the information provided by this website, please contact the original author. The copyright belongs to the original author. If you need to contact this website regarding copyright, please do so within 15 days. |