Canada 'Freedom Convoy' leader found guilty over trucker protest role
Trump transition aide Boris Epshteyn sparking internal strife over appointments
Mayra Guillén, the younger sister of Army soldier Vanessa Guillén — whose death brought attention to and galvanized the military’s handling of sexual assault cases — came out on Wednesday in support of President-elect Donald Trump’s defense secretary nominee Pete Hegseth. “I have full faith in President Trump’s nomination of @PeteHegseth as Secretary of Defense,” Guillén posted. Guillén’s endorsement of Hegseth could go a long way to win over support for him from Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA), who has worked on the issue of military sexual assault, as well as from other senators who may be on the fence on Hegseth’s confirmation. Guillén posted on X: My sister Vanessa Guillén was proud to serve our country. Undoubtedly Vanessa’s death was THE catalyst for the much needed changes for our military. President @realDonaldTrump supported the I Am Vanessa Guillén Act, which was the greatest change in history of our military code. I have full faith in President Trump’s nomination of @PeteHegseth as Secretary of Defense. Guillén criticized Biden Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, saying he continued to deny benefits to members of the military, and for the current recruitment and retention crisis due to politicization and “lack of trust.” She wrote: Over the last 4 years, Secretary Austin continued to deny benefits to our military that they rightly earned and deserved. In fact, under Secretary Austin’s watch, we had the lowest enlistment and active duty service members in the history of our country, due mainly to the politics, the lack of trust and the low morale. We need a disruptor like Pete Hegseth to fix the bureaucratic .institution that the Pentagon has become. I believe Pete Hegseth will bring back the morale, and provide our service members the rights they deserve, so we can strengthen and maintain the greatest military in the world! Guillén’s support comes amid a concerted campaign to sink Hegseth’s nomination. Guillén found herself in the middle of an anti-Trump campaign when the Atlantic published anonymous claims that Trump had disparaged her sister and her family. She spoke out directly to shoot down the unverified claims, blasting the publication for “exploiting her sister’s death for politics” and revealing that she voted for Trump earlier that day. Follow Breitbart News’s Kristina Wong on ”X” , Truth Social , or on Facebook .Fox News Flash top sports headlines are here. Check out what's clicking on Foxnews.com. Ohio State Buckeyes center Aaron Bradshaw is being investigated for a potential "domestic incident," according to The Columbus Dispatch , which has led to him being absent from team activities. This accusation would explain a rather open-ended statement by the team this past Friday before Ohio State played Campbell. "Aaron Bradshaw is not currently participating in team activities," the statement read. "The university is following its established process. Due to federal privacy laws, we cannot share further information at this time." CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM Ohio State Buckeyes forward Aaron Bradshaw drives around Evansville Purple Aces forward Connor Turnbull at Value City Arena in Columbus on Tuesday, Nov. 19, 2024. (IMAGN) Head coach Jake Diebler wouldn’t elaborate on Bradshaw’s situation following the 104-60 win over Campbell. He’s not expected to play in the team’s contest against Green Bay on Monday as well, with no timeline on when he could rejoin the Buckeyes on the court. 2025 MEN'S MARCH MADNESS ODDS: DUKE BECOMES NEW FAVORITE The Columbus Dispatch reports that no charges have been filed against Bradshaw, though an incident allegedly occurred at his off-campus apartment this past week. Bradshaw has started the four games he’s played for Ohio State this year, which is his first with the program after transferring from Kentucky after his freshman year in 2023. Ohio State Buckeyes forward Aaron Bradshaw drives to the basket against the Texas A&M Aggies at Reed Arena. (Maria Lysaker-Imagn Images) Over 23.5 minutes on the floor, Bradshaw is averaging 7.8 points, 4.8 rebounds, and 1.8 blocks per game with 31 total points scored. Bradshaw was the top center prospect coming out of Camden High School in New Jersey in 2023, ultimately choosing Kentucky to play under head coach John Calipari. However, after a surprise early exit in the NCAA tournament earlier this year, Calipari left to coach Arkansas in a shocking move given his history with the Wildcats. It led to multiple transfers with Mark Pope taking over in Kentucky. Despite speculation that Bradshaw would return to his home state to play for Rutgers after they landed stars Ace Bailey and Dylan Harper, he chose the Buckeyes. Ohio State Buckeyes forward Aaron Bradshaw during a timeout in the Texas A&M Aggies game at Reed Arena. (IMAGN) CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP Bradshaw played in 26 games for Kentucky last season, starting 10 of them, where he averaged 4.9 points and 3.3 rebounds. Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X , and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter . Scott Thompson is a sports writer for Fox News Digital.Team New York played Team London in GOLFZON Tour's third match. golfzon This article was produced in partnership with GOLFZON. What began as a 12-team simulator-golf match-play competition for a $150,000 grand prize is now a nine-team battle to the finish. Matches 1, 2 and 3 have been completed on GOLFZON Tour — a new league in which regional teams of five players each from 12 selected GOLFZON host facilities (nine are in the U.S., three others are from London, Toronto and Mexico) compete against each other in a series of matches, with one team earning the grand prize payout. Team Orlando defeated Team Louisville in Match 1, while Team Minneapolis defeated Team Chicago in Match 2. (You can read the full match recaps here .) The Format Single-elimination bracket play is now in progress. Female competitors play 85 percent of the yardage of their male counterparts. Teams of three compete head-to-head by linking their simulators together over the Internet in a match-play format, with two of the best three player scores for each team counting on each hole. If, after 18 holes, there’s a tie, the match goes into a sudden-death playoff where all three players’ scores count. The first team to score lower than the other on a hole wins. GOLFZON Tour Match 3 Recap: New York vs. London In this GOLFZON Tour international matchup, Team New York and Team London battled on El Camaleon , a longtime PGA Tour host course which has most recently served as a host venue for LIV. The teams competed against each other in real time from their regional simulator locations. Team New York started strong, winning the first two holes to take an early 2 up lead. But then a back-and-forth battle began, with Team London winning the 4th hole, Team New York winning the 5th, and Team London getting on a roll, winning the 6th, 7th and 8th holes to take the lead in the match for the first time, going 1 up through 8. A Team New York victory on the 9th hole, however, brought the match back to all square at the turn. On the back nine, it was Team New York’s turn to make a run. With wins on Nos. 10, 11 and 12, Team New York regained control of the match, going 3 up with six holes remaining. Team London fought back with a win on the 13th hole to cut the deficit to 2, but Team New York’s lead proved to be too much to overcome. A win on No. 15 brought New York back to 3 up, and when Team London failed to win the 16th hole to extend the match, it was over, with Team New York winning the match 3 and 2. That means Team New York is one of nine teams still in the running for the grand prize of $150,000, and will face Team Detroit next in GOLFZON Tour’s quarterfinal round. The Teams The 12 teams competing in this edition of GOLFZON Tour are: East Division Detroit – Tee Times London – The Golf Rooms – ELIMINATED (Match 3) Louisville – Tee It Up Golf USA – ELIMINATED (Match 1) New York City – Golfzon Social Orlando – Golfzon Leadbetter Toronto – Golfplay West Division Chicago – The Green – ELIMINATED (Match 2) Houston – The Daly Round Los Angeles – Golf Envy Mexico – Mulligan’s Monterrey Minneapolis – Element Indoor Golf Tulsa – BirdieBay Follow the action You can watch the matches in their entirety on GOLFZON’s YouTube page , where new episodes and match recaps will be released weekly. The tour is in the midst of single-elimination rounds, so you can follow along each week to see which team ends up making it to the finale in January. To learn more about GOLFZON Tour — and follow the match-play bracket progress — click here . Latest In Lifestyle Golf.com Editor As a four-year member of Columbia’s inaugural class of female varsity golfers, Jessica can out-birdie everyone on the masthead. She can out-hustle them in the office, too, where she’s primarily responsible for producing both print and online features, and overseeing major special projects, such as GOLF’s inaugural Style Issue, which debuted in February 2018. Her original interview series, “A Round With,” debuted in November of 2015, and appeared in both in the magazine and in video form on GOLF.com.
It is an ambitious social experiment of our moment in history — one that experts say could accomplish something that parents, schools and other governments have attempted with varying degrees of success: keeping kids off social media until they turn 16. Australia’s new law, approved by its Parliament last week, is an attempt to swim against many tides of modern life — formidable forces like technology, marketing, globalization and, of course, the iron will of a teenager. And like efforts of the past to protect kids from things that parents believe they’re not ready for, the nation’s move is both ambitious and not exactly simple, particularly in a world where young people are often shaped, defined and judged by the online company they keep. The ban won’t go into effect for another year. But how will Australia be able to enforce it? That’s not clear, nor will it be easy. TikTok, Snapchat and Instagram have become so ingrained in young people’s lives that going cold turkey will be difficult. Other questions loom. Does the ban limit kids’ free expression and — especially for those in vulnerable groups — isolate them and curtail their opportunity to connect with members of their community? And how will social sites verify people’s ages, anyway? Can’t kids just get around such technicalities, as they so often do? Related Story: Platforms Will Be Held Liable The law will make platforms including TikTok, Facebook, Snapchat, Reddit, X and Instagram liable for fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars ($33 million) for systemic failures to prevent children younger than 16 from holding accounts. “It’s clear that social media companies have to be held accountable, which is what Australia is trying to do,” said Jim Steyer, president and CEO of the nonprofit Common Sense Media. Leaders and parents in countries around the world are watching Australia’s policy closely as many seek to protect young kids from the internet’s dangerous corners — and, not incidentally, from each other. Most nations have taken different routes, from parental consent requirements to minimum age limits. Many child safety experts, parents and even teens who have waited to get on social media consider Australia’s move a positive step. They say there’s ample reason to ensure that children wait. “What’s most important for kids, just like adults, is real human connection. Less time alone on the screen means more time to connect, not less,” said Julie Scelfo, the founder of Mothers Against Media Addiction, or MAMA, a grassroots group of parents aimed at combatting the harms of social media to children. “I’m confident we can support our kids in interacting in any number of ways aside from sharing the latest meme.” The harms to children from social media have been well documented in the two decades since Facebook’s launch ushered in a new era in how the world communicates. Kids who spend more time on social media, especially as tweens or young teenagers, are more likely to experience depression and anxiety, according to multiple studies — though it is not yet clear if there is a causal relationship. What’s more, many are exposed to content that is not appropriate for their age, including pornography and violence, as well as social pressures about body image and makeup. They also face bullying, sexual harassment and unwanted advances from their peers as well as adult strangers. Because their brains are not fully developed, teenagers, especially younger ones the law is focused on, are also more affected by social comparisons than adults, so even happy posts from friends can send them into a negative spiral. What Unintended Harms Could Be Caused? Many major initiatives, particularly those aimed at social engineering, can produce side effects — often unintended. Could that happen here? What, if anything, do kids stand to lose by separating kids and the networks in which they participate? Paul Taske, associate director of litigation at the tech lobbying group NetChoice, says he considers the ban “one of the most extreme violations of free speech on the world stage today” even as he expressed relief that the First Amendment prevents such law in the United States “These restrictions would create a massive cultural shift,” Taske said. “Not only is the Australian government preventing young people from engaging with issues they’re passionate about, but they’re also doing so even if their parents are ok with them using digital services,” he said. “Parents know their children and their needs the best, and they should be making these decisions for their families — not big government. That kind of forcible control over families inevitably will have downstream cultural impacts.” David Inserra, a fellow for Free Expression and Technology, Cato Institute, called the bill “about as useful as an ashtray on a motorbike” in a recent blog post. While Australia’s law doesn’t require “hard verification” such as an uploaded ID, he said, it calls for effective “age assurance.” He said no verification system can ensure accuracy while also protecting privacy and not impacting adults in the process. Privacy advocates have also raised concerns about the law’s effect on online anonymity, a cornerstone of online communications — and something that can protect teens on social platforms. “Whether it be religious minorities and dissidents, LGBTQ youth, those in abusive situations, whistleblowers, or countless other speakers in tricky situations, anonymous speech is a critical tool to safely challenge authority and express controversial opinions,” Inserra said. A spot check of kids at one mall in the Australian city of Brisbane on Wednesday didn’t turn up a great deal of worry, though. “Social media is still important because you get to talk to people, but I think it’s still good that they’re like limiting it,” said Swan Son, a 13-year-old student at Brisbane State High School. She said she has had limited exposure to social media and wouldn’t really miss it for a couple of years. Her parents already enforce a daily one-hour limit. And as for her friends? “I see them at school every day, so I think I’ll be fine.” Conor Negric, 16, said he felt he’d dodged a bullet because of his age. Still, he considers the law reasonable. “I think 16 is fine. Some kids, I know some kids like 10 who’re on Instagram, Snapchat. I only got Instagram when I was 14.” His mom, Sive Negric, who has two teenage sons, said she was happy for her boys to avoid exposure to social media too early: “That aspect of the internet, it’s a bit `meanland.'” Related Story: Other Countries Are Trying to Figure It Out, Too Parents in Britain and across Europe earlier this year organized on platforms such as WhatsApp and Telegram to promise not to buy smartphones for children younger than 12 or 13. This approach costs almost no money and requires no government enforcement. In the United States, some parents are keeping kids off social media either informally or as part of an organized campaign such as Wait Until 8th, a group that helps parents delay kids’ access to social media and phones. This fall, Norway announced plans to ban kids under 15 from using social media, while France is testing a smartphone ban for kids under 15 in a limited number of schools — a policy that could be rolled out nationwide if successful. U.S. lawmakers have held multiple congressional hearings — most recently in January — on child online safety. Still, the last federal law aimed at protecting children online was enacted in 1998, six years before Facebook’s founding. In July, the U.S. Senate overwhelmingly passed legislation designed to protect children from dangerous online content, pushing forward with what would be the first major effort by Congress in decades to hold tech companies more accountable. But the Kids Online Safety Act has since stalled in the House. Related Story: While several states have passed laws requiring age verification, those are stuck in court. Utah became the first state to pass laws regulating children’s social media use in 2023. In September, a judge issued the preliminary injunction against the law, which would have required social media companies to verify the ages of users, apply privacy settings and limit some features. NetChoice has also obtained injunctions temporarily halting similar laws in several other states. And last May, U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy said there is insufficient evidence to show social media is safe for kids. He urged policymakers to treat social media like car seats, baby formula, medication and other products children use. “Why should social media products be any different? Scelfo said. “Parents cannot possibly bear the entire responsibility of keeping children safe online, because the problems are baked into the design of the products.”
Friendly reminder |
The authenticity of this information has not been verified by this website and is for your reference only. Please do not reprint without permission. If authorized by this website, it should be used within the scope of authorization and marked with "Source: this website". |
Special attention |
Some articles on this website are reprinted from other media. The purpose of reprinting is to convey more industry information, which does not mean that this website agrees with their views and is responsible for their authenticity. Those who make comments on this website forum are responsible for their own content. This website has the right to reprint or quote on the website. The comments on the forum do not represent the views of this website. If you need to use the information provided by this website, please contact the original author. The copyright belongs to the original author. If you need to contact this website regarding copyright, please do so within 15 days. |